IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i19-20p2758-2767.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors that influence obesity, functional capacity, anxiety and depression outcomes following a Phase III cardiac rehabilitation programme

Author

Listed:
  • Gabrielle McKee
  • Mary Kerins
  • Geraldine Fitzgerald
  • Marie Spain
  • Karen Morrison

Abstract

Aims and objectives To examine changes in functional capacity, anxiety, depression and BMI in patients who completed a cardiac rehabilitation programme and to determine the influencing factors. Background While the effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation is long established, more studies are needed to examine the combined effectiveness of this multicomponent intervention and the factors that influence this in the changed profile of patients currently attending cardiac rehabilitation. Design The study was a longitudinal retrospective study of patients following a six‐ or eight‐week Phase III cardiac rehabilitation programme. Methods The study recruited 154 patients. Functional capacity, anxiety, depression, weight, waist circumference and BMI were assessed at the beginning and end of cardiac rehabilitation. t‐tests were used to assess changes over time, and multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the influence of factors on these changes. Results Significant improvements were seen in functional capacity, waist circumference, weight and BMI, but not in depression and anxiety. Multivariate analysis revealed that being younger and less fit was associated with greater improvements in functional capacity while reason for referral, gender, depression or BMI did not influence improvements in functional capacity. Models testing the influence of the factors on BMI, anxiety and depression were not significant. Conclusion Cardiac rehabilitation is still an effective method to instigate changes in cardiac risk factors despite the changes in patients profile attending programmes. Relevance to clinical practice Continued encouragement of the historically less typical patients to participate in cardiac rehabilitation is needed as reason for referral, gender, depression or BMI did not influence improvements in functional capacity. Despite psychosocial components within the programme, no significant improvements were observed over cardiac rehabilitation in depression or anxiety. While effectiveness was observed, there is room for further optimisation of practice and research by employing and documenting clearly the use of behavioural techniques.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabrielle McKee & Mary Kerins & Geraldine Fitzgerald & Marie Spain & Karen Morrison, 2013. "Factors that influence obesity, functional capacity, anxiety and depression outcomes following a Phase III cardiac rehabilitation programme," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(19-20), pages 2758-2767, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:19-20:p:2758-2767
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12233
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12233
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12233?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Susan Barnason & Lani Zimmerman & Paula Schulz & Carol Pullen & Sue Schuelke, 2019. "Weight management telehealth intervention for overweight and obese rural cardiac rehabilitation participants: A randomised trial," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1808-1818, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:19-20:p:2758-2767. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.