IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i19-20p2687-2695.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The development and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the maternal attachment inventory

Author

Listed:
  • Chen‐Jung Chen
  • Huei‐chuan Sung
  • Yi‐Chang Chen
  • Ching‐Yuan Chang
  • Ming‐Shinn Lee

Abstract

Aims and objectives To develop the Maternal Attachment Inventory (MAI) into Chinese and assess its psychometric properties. Background The MAI measures of maternal affectionate attachment. This scale displays the most appropriate indicators associated with attachment and has been widely adopted in different fields for measuring maternal–infant attachment. Design Cross‐sectional survey design. Methods The study was carried out in two clinics. From the accessible population of 507 samples, a simple random sampling method of selection was used to randomly choose 200 names of mothers at 4–8 months after delivery using a computer. One hundred and eighty‐one mothers agreed to participate in the study. The Chinese version of the MAI (CMAI) was developed in five stages: translation, review, back‐translation, a review by a panel of specialists and a pilot test. Regarding the reliability of the CMAI, a test of correlations between the subscales and the entire scale was performed consecutively. With respect to the validity of the MAI, exploratory factor analyses, a test of relationships between items and subscales, and an analysis of concurrent criterion‐related validity were conducted. Results The CMAI contains four factors in its structure. The CMAI and its subscales possess good internal consistency; the Cronbach's α coefficient was 0·94. In addition, the Pearson product‐moment correlation coefficient between the CMAI and the Maternal–Fetal Attachment Inventory (MFAI) and between the CMAI and the Maternal–Infant Attachment Inventory (MIAI) was 0·38 and 0·5, respectively. This suggests significant medium and high respective correlations between the CMAI and these two scales. One major limitation of this study is that participants were recruited from two clinics located in central Taiwan. Conclusions The CMAI possesses acceptable reliability and validity for use in measuring the levels of attachment and affectional ties between mothers and their infants. Relevance to clinical practice The CMAI provides further evidence of the applicability of the CMAI in clinical maternity care services.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen‐Jung Chen & Huei‐chuan Sung & Yi‐Chang Chen & Ching‐Yuan Chang & Ming‐Shinn Lee, 2013. "The development and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the maternal attachment inventory," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(19-20), pages 2687-2695, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:19-20:p:2687-2695
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12162
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12162?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:19-20:p:2687-2695. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.