IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i17-18p2605-2613.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Career development: graduate nurse views

Author

Listed:
  • Michelle Cleary
  • Jan Horsfall
  • Paulpandi Muthulakshmi
  • Brenda Happell
  • Glenn E Hunt

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore recent Singapore nursing graduates' experience of and views about their career development and progress. Background The recruitment and retention of an adequate number of registered nurses is a continuing workforce issue in Singapore and other major cities. Design Survey of recent nursing graduates. Methods Recent nursing graduates from the Bachelor programme (n = 147) were sent an individual survey; a response rate of 54% was achieved. Results Findings show that nurses rated their self‐concept in a positive manner and were most satisfied (moderately to very) with helping patients and providing effective care, and the level of patient involvement. They were least satisfied (moderately to only a little) with prestige among the general medical community and the general public, hours of work, lifestyle factors and research opportunities. The following four factors were identified as significant impediments to career development; lack of support in the work place; perceived insufficient clinical career development opportunities; excessive work hours; and limited access to merit‐based places in further education. Conclusions Suggestions made to overcome perceived career development barriers are as follows: broad multifactorial healthcare system changes; decreased and more flexible working hours; and fairer access to further clinical and higher education. Relevance to clinical practice Results highlight the value clinical nurses place on having access to career development opportunities, merit‐based further education and work place supports. These factors also have the potential to influence patient care and impact on the retention of nurses in their present job and satisfaction with their nursing career.

Suggested Citation

  • Michelle Cleary & Jan Horsfall & Paulpandi Muthulakshmi & Brenda Happell & Glenn E Hunt, 2013. "Career development: graduate nurse views," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(17-18), pages 2605-2613, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:17-18:p:2605-2613
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12080
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12080
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12080?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Linda Gellerstedt & Annelie Moquist & Anette Roos & Bergkvist Karin & Åsa Gransjön Craftman, 2019. "Newly graduated nurses' experiences of a trainee programme regarding the introduction process and leadership in a hospital setting—A qualitative interview study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1685-1694, May.
    2. Yee Mun Jessica Leong & Joanna Crossman, 2016. "Tough love or bullying? New nurse transitional experiences," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(9-10), pages 1356-1366, May.
    3. Mandyoli Bulelwa & Iwu Chux Gervase & Nxopo Zinzi, 2017. "Is there a Nexus between Social Entrepreneurship and the Employability of Graduates?," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 61-74, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:17-18:p:2605-2613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.