IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i17-18p2404-2416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Rasch‐based dimension of delivery experience: spontaneous vs. medically assisted conception

Author

Listed:
  • Stefania Mannarini
  • Marilisa Boffo
  • Veronica Bertucci
  • Alessandra Andrisani
  • Guido Ambrosini

Abstract

Aims and objectives To devise a set of indices representative of a latent dimension of delivery perception, aimed at the assessment of birth experience after both spontaneous and medically assisted conception. Background Birth experience is of great importance for its prognostic value for the woman and newborn's psychophysical well‐being, especially after the experience of assisted reproduction technology. Up to date, a delivery perception assessment measure targeted to both spontaneously and medically assisted conceiving women does not exist yet. Design Measure development and psychometric analysis; quantitative and qualitative analysis of women's delivery experience measures. Methods Thirty‐one indices characterising seven relevant aspects of birth perception were devised from the literature and evaluated on a 4‐point Likert‐type scale by 98 childbearing women (54 spontaneously and 44 medically assisted conceiving) in the 24–48 hours postpartum time frame. Women's obstetric history information was also collected. The dimension psychometric definition was pursued within a latent trait perspective, by applying the many‐facet Rasch measurement model. Results A latent delivery perception dimension composed of 18 valid and reliable indices, qualifying six labour and delivery perception clinical aspects, was identified. Medically assisted conceiving women evidenced a more positive birth perception, but when analysing each index, they showed peculiar intense worries about themselves and their baby's health, even if they felt more satisfied, safer and stronger in almost every labour and birth aspect. Conclusions The delivery perception dimension integrates all relevant birth experience aspects in 18 easy‐to‐administer indices and provides a valid, reliable and feasible assessment tool for both the clinical practice and research purposes. Relevance to clinical practice The delivery perception dimension clearly discriminates between women's types of conception and identifies relevant differences in their birth experience, which are interesting for their clinical implications within a prognostic and intervention perspective of support provision in the early postpartum period.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefania Mannarini & Marilisa Boffo & Veronica Bertucci & Alessandra Andrisani & Guido Ambrosini, 2013. "A Rasch‐based dimension of delivery experience: spontaneous vs. medically assisted conception," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(17-18), pages 2404-2416, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:17-18:p:2404-2416
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12264
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12264?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:17-18:p:2404-2416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.