IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i15-16p2308-2317.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In‐hospital mortality after serious adverse events on medical and surgical nursing units: a mixed methods study

Author

Listed:
  • Koen De Meester
  • Peter Van Bogaert
  • Sean P Clarke
  • Leo Bossaert

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To investigate the circumstances of nursing care eight hours before serious adverse events (=SAE’s) on medical and surgical nursing units with subsequent in‐hospital mortality in order to identify the extent to which these SAE’s were potentially preventable. Background. The prevention of SAE ‘s in acute care is coming under increasing scrutiny, while the role nursing care plays in the prevention of acute critical deterioration of patients is unclear. Methods. Retrospective review of patient records of 63 SAE’s in a Belgian teaching hospital where death was the final outcome following a cardiac arrest team call or unplanned ICU admission from an acute care unit. Data from chart reviews were combined with data regarding working conditions on the nursing unit at the time of the events and experts’ opinions regarding the preventability of the outcomes. Finally, a pilot survey of staff nurses about their experiences with deteriorating patients and knowledge of vital signs and call criteria was conducted independently of the chart abstractions and case reviews. Results. Experts were almost five times more likely to designate a case as potentially preventable when a cardiac arrest team call was the terminal event and were 40% less likely to designate a case as potentially preventable when more observations were documented in patient records. Survey results revealed that nurses were often unaware that their patients were deteriorating before the crisis. Nurses also reported threshold levels for concern for abnormal vital signs that suggested they would call for assistance relatively late in clinical crises. Conclusion. Renewed attention to accurate recording, documentation and interpretation of vital signs in hospital nursing practice appears needed. Relevance to clinical practice. Timely detection of deteriorating patients to assist staff to improve their outcomes appears to be jeopardised by a number of practices and factors and merits deeper study.

Suggested Citation

  • Koen De Meester & Peter Van Bogaert & Sean P Clarke & Leo Bossaert, 2013. "In‐hospital mortality after serious adverse events on medical and surgical nursing units: a mixed methods study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(15-16), pages 2308-2317, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:15-16:p:2308-2317
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04154.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04154.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04154.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. María Dolores Redel-Macías & Pilar Aparicio-Martinez & Sara Pinzi & Pedro Arezes & Antonio José Cubero-Atienza, 2021. "Monitoring Sound and Its Perception during the Lockdown and De-Escalation of COVID-19 Pandemic: A Spanish Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Åsa Andersson & Catharina Frank & Ania ML Willman & Per‐Olof Sandman & Görel Hansebo, 2018. "Factors contributing to serious adverse events in nursing homes," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 354-362, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:15-16:p:2308-2317. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.