IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i15-16p2286-2297.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Screening physical health? Yes! But…: nurses’ views on physical health screening in mental health care

Author

Listed:
  • Brenda Happell
  • David Scott
  • Janette Nankivell
  • Chris Platania‐Phung

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore nurses’ views on the role of nurses in screening and monitoring for physical care of consumers with serious mental illness, at a regional mental health care service. Background People with serious mental illness experience heightened incidence of preventable and treatable physical illnesses such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Screening and monitoring are considered universal clinical safeguards. Nurses can potentially facilitate systematic screening, but their views on physical health care practices are rarely investigated. Design Qualitative exploratory study. Method Focus group interviews with 38 nurses of a regional mental health care service district of Australia. To facilitate discussion, participants were presented with a screening system, called the Health Improvement Profile (HIP), as an exemplar of screening of physical health risks by nurses. Inductive data analysis and theme development were guided by a thematic analysis framework. Results Nurses argued that treatable and preventable physical health problems were common. Four main themes were identified: screening – essential for good practice; the policy‐practice gap; ‘screening then what?’ and, is HIP the answer? Screening and monitoring were considered crucial to proper diagnosis and treatment, however, were not performed systematically or consistently. Nurse readiness for an enhanced role in screening was shaped by: role and responsibility issues, legal liability concerns, funding and staff shortages. Participants were concerned that lack of follow up would limit effectiveness of these interventions. Conclusions Screening was considered an important clinical step in effective diagnosis and treatment; however, identified barriers need to be addressed to ensure screening is part of a systemic approach to improve physical health of consumers with serious mental illness. Relevance to clinical practice Nurses have potential to influence improvement in physical health outcomes for consumers of mental health services. Such potential can only be realised if a systematic approach to physical health care is taken.

Suggested Citation

  • Brenda Happell & David Scott & Janette Nankivell & Chris Platania‐Phung, 2013. "Screening physical health? Yes! But…: nurses’ views on physical health screening in mental health care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(15-16), pages 2286-2297, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:15-16:p:2286-2297
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04325.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04325.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04325.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brenda Happell & Karen Wilson & Chris Platania‐Phung & Robert Stanton, 2017. "Filling the gaps and finding our way: family carers navigating the healthcare system to access physical health services for the people they care for," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(13-14), pages 1917-1926, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:15-16:p:2286-2297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.