IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i15-16p2264-2272.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Tolerating violence’: a qualitative study into the experience of professionals working within one UK learning disability service

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Lovell
  • Joanne Skellern

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore this complexity further, enhancing understanding of professionals' experience of violence and reasons for non‐reporting with regard to people with a learning disability. Background This article reports on a qualitative follow‐up study to a whole‐population survey investigating the under‐reporting of violence within one learning disability service. The survey had identified a pronounced level of under‐reporting but suggested an unexpected degree of complexity around the issue, which warranted further study. Design A qualitative research design was employed. Methods Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with 22 professionals working in learning disability services; data were subsequently transcribed verbatim and subject to stringent thematic analysis. Results The findings confirmed that the decision to report an incident or not was complicated by professional interpretation of violence. Three themes were produced by the analysis: the reality of violence, change over time and (zero) tolerance. Conclusion The study indicates that both experience of violence and ways of understanding it in relation to learning disability are shared across professional groups, although nurses are both more inured and generally more accepting of it. The study suggests that the relationship between learning disability nurses and service users with a propensity for violence is complicated by issues of professional background and concerns about the pertinence of zero tolerance. Relevance to clinical practice The availability of effective protocols and procedures is important, but services need also to acknowledge the more ambiguous aspects of the therapeutic relationship to fully understand under‐reporting of service user violence in the context of learning disability.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Lovell & Joanne Skellern, 2013. "‘Tolerating violence’: a qualitative study into the experience of professionals working within one UK learning disability service," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(15-16), pages 2264-2272, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:15-16:p:2264-2272
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12164
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12164
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12164?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrew Lovell & Debra Smith & Paula Johnson, 2015. "A qualitative investigation into nurses' perceptions of factors influencing staff injuries sustained during physical interventions employed in response to service user violence within one secure learn," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(13-14), pages 1926-1935, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:15-16:p:2264-2272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.