IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i15-16p2225-2232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perinatal brain injury, visual motor function and poor school outcome of regional low birth weight survivors at age nine

Author

Listed:
  • Jun Zhang
  • Ashley Darcy Mahoney
  • Jennifer A Pinto‐Martin

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore the relationship between perinatal brain injury, visual motor function (VMF) and poor school outcome. Background Little is known about the status and underlying mechanism of poor school outcome as experienced by low birth weight survivors. Design This is a secondary data analysis. Methods The parental study recruited 1104 low birth weight (LBW) infants weighing ≤ 2000 g from three medical centres of Central New Jersey between 1984 and 1987. Seven hundred and seventy‐seven infants survived the neonatal period, and their developmental outcomes had been following up regularly until now. The development data of the survivors were used to achieve the research aims. Initial school outcome assessment was carried out in 9‐year‐old, using the Woodcock‐Johnson Academic Achievement Scale. The severity and range of perinatal brain injury was determined by repeated neonatal cranial ultrasound results obtained at 4 hours, 24 hours and 7 days of life. Results Seventeen and a half per cent of the sample experienced poor school performance at age 9 as defined by lower than one standard deviation (SD) of average performance score. Children with the most severe injury, PL/VE, had the lowest mathematics (F = 14·54, p = 0·000) and reading (anova results: F = 11·56, p = 0·000) performances. Visual motor function had a significant effect on children's overall school performance (Hotelling's trace value was 0·028, F = 3·414, p = 0·018), as well as subtest scores for reading (p = 0·006) and mathematics (p = 0·036). However, visual motor function was not a mediator in the association of perinatal brain injury and school outcome. Conclusions Perinatal brain injury had a significant long‐term effect on school outcome. Relevance to clinical practice Low birth weight infants with history of perinatal brain injury need be closely monitored to substantially reduce the rates of poor school outcome and other neurodevelopmental disabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Jun Zhang & Ashley Darcy Mahoney & Jennifer A Pinto‐Martin, 2013. "Perinatal brain injury, visual motor function and poor school outcome of regional low birth weight survivors at age nine," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(15-16), pages 2225-2232, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:15-16:p:2225-2232
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04328.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04328.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04328.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:15-16:p:2225-2232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.