IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i15-16p2206-2215.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anaemia management protocols in the care of haemodialysis patients: examining patient outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Sushila Saunders
  • Martha LP MacLeod
  • Vince Salyers
  • Peter D MacMillan
  • Malcolm R Ogborn

Abstract

Aims and objectives To determine whether the use of a nurse‐driven protocol in the haemodialysis setting is as safe and effective as traditional physician‐driven approaches to anaemia management. Background The role of haemodialysis nurses in renal anaemia management has evolved through the implementation of nurse‐driven protocols, addressing the trend of exceeding haemoglobin targets and rising costs of erythropoietin‐stimulating agents. Design Retrospective, non‐equivalent case control group design. Methods The sample was from three haemodialysis units in a control group (n = 64) and three haemodialysis units in a protocol group (n = 43). The protocol group used a nurse‐driven renal anaemia management protocol, while the control group used a traditional physician‐driven approach to renal anaemia management. All retrospective data were obtained from a provincial renal database. Data were analysed using chi‐square tests and t‐tests. Patient outcomes examined were haemoglobin levels, transferrin saturation levels, erythropoietin‐stimulating agents use and intravenous iron use. Cost comparisons were determined using average use of erythropoietin‐stimulating agents and intravenous iron. Results Control and protocol groups reached haemoglobin target levels. In the protocol group, 75% reached transferrin saturation target levels in comparison with 25% of the control group. Use and costs for iron was higher in the control group, while use and costs for erythropoietin was higher in the protocol group. The higher usage of erythropoietin‐stimulating agents was potentially related to comorbid conditions amongst the protocol group. Conclusions A nurse‐driven protocol approach to renal anaemia management was as effective as the physician‐driven approach in reaching haemoglobin and transferrin saturation levels. Further examination of the use and dosing of erythropoietin‐stimulating agents and intravenous iron, their impact on haemoglobin levels related to patient comorbidities and subsequent cost effectiveness of protocols is required. Relevance to clinical practice Using a nurse‐driven protocol in practice supports the independent nursing role while contributing to safe patient outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Sushila Saunders & Martha LP MacLeod & Vince Salyers & Peter D MacMillan & Malcolm R Ogborn, 2013. "Anaemia management protocols in the care of haemodialysis patients: examining patient outcomes," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(15-16), pages 2206-2215, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:15-16:p:2206-2215
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12059
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12059?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sani George & Margaret McCann, 2020. "A nurse prescriber‐led protocol for anaemia management in established haemodialysis patients: A retrospective study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2535-2543, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:15-16:p:2206-2215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.