IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i15-16p2172-2182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors associated with health‐related quality of life among overweight or obese adults

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Wang
  • Susan M Sereika
  • Mindi A Styn
  • Lora E Burke

Abstract

Aims and objectives To identify factors associated with health‐related quality of life among overweight or obese adults. Background The obesity epidemic presents a global challenge. Obesity is associated with lower health‐related quality of life; however, no study has comprehensively examined correlates of health‐related quality of life in this population. Design A cross‐sectional design. Methods The physical component score, mental component score and eight domain scores of the Short Form‐36 v2 were used to assess health‐related quality of life. We identified 23 possible correlates of health‐related quality of life, including age, body mass index, health and weight histories, perceived stress, cholesterol‐lowering diet self‐efficacy, problem‐solving, binge eating, dietary intake and physical activity. Correlational analyses were used to examine the bivariate associations between correlates and health‐related quality of life variables. All possible subsets regression was used to develop predictive models of health‐related quality of life. Results The sample (n = 210) was predominantly White (84·8%), female (78·1%) and middle‐aged (average age = 46·80 years). Age, body mass index, education, having children at home, and being hypertensive were identified as the best predictors of physical component score, explaining about 9% of the variance. Age, marital status, having hyperlipidaemia, perceived stress, problem‐solving, self‐efficacy, binge eating and barriers to healthy eating predicted mental component score, explaining approximately 48% of the variance. Physical functioning and role physical domains of health‐related quality of life had similar sets of predictors, with 15% and 13% of the variance explained, respectively, while similar predictors were identified for bodily pain (6%), general health (26%), vitality (40%), social functioning (32%), role emotional (42%) and mental health (46%) domains. Conclusions Psychosocial factors were associated with the mental‐related quality of life. Further exploration of factors related to physical‐related quality of life is warranted in this population. Relevance to clinical practice When working with overweight/obese adults who are trying to lose weight, nurses need to consider socio‐demographic and psychosocial factors in the development of a treatment plan that will improve health‐related quality of life in this population.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Wang & Susan M Sereika & Mindi A Styn & Lora E Burke, 2013. "Factors associated with health‐related quality of life among overweight or obese adults," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(15-16), pages 2172-2182, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:15-16:p:2172-2182
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12280
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12280
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12280?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oziely Daniela Armenta-Hernandez & Aidé Aracely Maldonado-Macias & Margarita Ortiz Solís & Miguel Ángel Serrano-Rosa & Yolanda Angélica Baez-López & Juan Luis Hernández-Arellano, 2020. "Effects of Job Content and Physical Activity on Body Mass Index among Obese Managers of the Mexican Manufacturing Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Courtney E. Jackson & Joanne DiPlacido, 2020. "Vitality as a Mediator Between Diet Quality and Subjective Wellbeing Among College Students," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 1617-1639, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:15-16:p:2172-2182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.