IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i13-14p2077-2086.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How do nurse prescribers integrate prescribing in practice: case studies in primary and secondary care

Author

Listed:
  • Dianne Bowskill
  • Stephen Timmons
  • Veronica James

Abstract

Aims and objectives To report a study investigating how nurse prescribers integrate prescribing in clinical practice. Factors that influence integration are explored and how nurses approach integration is defined. Background There are expectations that nurse prescribers will prescribe for patients. Nurse prescribers share jurisdiction of prescribing with doctors in the workplace and new divisions of labour must be agreed to enable the nurse to begin prescribing. Little is known about how nurses integrate prescribing in practice but these agreements are potentially important to the organisation of professional work and the delivery of healthcare. Design Case study. Methods Twenty six nurse prescribers were interviewed in case studies of primary and secondary care prescribing. Case data were collected by semi‐structured interview and combined with field notes and socio‐demographic data in case summaries. Data were organised in nvivo (QSR International Pty Ltd, Doncaster, Victoria, Australia) and subject to manual analysis at single and cross‐case level. Results Twenty‐one of the 26 cases were prescribing. Trust between doctor and nurse and nurse and employer was shown to be necessary for effective integration. There were differences in how prescribing agreements were reached in primary and secondary care. Restrictions were imposed in secondary care. In primary care, nurses made decisions themselves about the medicines they prescribe but frequently asked doctors to check their decisions. Nurses described three approaches to prescribing: as opportunity presents, for specific conditions and for individuals. Conclusions Nurse prescribers described three approaches to prescribing and in two approaches the nurse self‐restricted prescribing activity. Secondary care prescribers had more employer restrictions than their primary care counterparts. Trust between doctor nurse and nurse employer was shown to be necessary for integration; without trust, the nurse will not prescribe. Relevance to practice Trust in prescribing relationships is necessary for effective integration of nurse prescribing in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Dianne Bowskill & Stephen Timmons & Veronica James, 2013. "How do nurse prescribers integrate prescribing in practice: case studies in primary and secondary care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(13-14), pages 2077-2086, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:13-14:p:2077-2086
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04338.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04338.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04338.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hanna Hopia & Anne Karhunen & Johanna Heikkilä, 2017. "Growth of nurse prescribing competence: facilitators and barriers during education," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(19-20), pages 3164-3173, October.
    2. Luke Emrich‐Mills & Paul Collier & Juniper West, 2019. "The role of nurse prescribers in memory services and their continuing professional development: A review of the literature," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1422-1432, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:13-14:p:2077-2086. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.