IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i13-14p1941-1950.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A qualitative study on non‐verbal sensitivity in nursing students

Author

Listed:
  • Zenobia CY Chan

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore nursing students’ perception of the meanings and roles of non‐verbal communication and sensitivity. It also attempts to understand how different factors influence their non‐verbal communication style. Background The importance of non‐verbal communication in the health arena lies in the need for good communication for efficient healthcare delivery. Understanding nursing students’ non‐verbal communication with patients and the influential factors is essential to prepare them for field work in the future. Design Qualitative approach based on 16 in‐depth interviews. Methods Sixteen nursing students from the Master of Nursing and the Year 3 Bachelor of Nursing program were interviewed. Major points in the recorded interviews were marked down for content analysis. Results Three main themes were developed: (1) understanding students’ non‐verbal communication, which shows how nursing students value and experience non‐verbal communication in the nursing context; (2) factors that influence the expression of non‐verbal cues, which reveals the effect of patients’ demographic background (gender, age, social status and educational level) and participants’ characteristics (character, age, voice and appearance); and (3) metaphors of non‐verbal communication, which is further divided into four subthemes: providing assistance, individualisation, dropping hints and promoting interaction. Conclusions Learning about students’ non‐verbal communication experiences in the clinical setting allowed us to understand their use of non‐verbal communication and sensitivity, as well as to understand areas that may need further improvement. Relevance to clinical practice The experiences and perceptions revealed by the nursing students could provoke nurses to reconsider the effects of the different factors suggested in this study. The results might also help students and nurses to learn and ponder their missing gap, leading them to rethink, train and pay more attention to their non‐verbal communication style and sensitivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Zenobia CY Chan, 2013. "A qualitative study on non‐verbal sensitivity in nursing students," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(13-14), pages 1941-1950, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:13-14:p:1941-1950
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04324.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04324.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04324.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:13-14:p:1941-1950. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.