IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i13-14p1917-1925.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multimodal interventions (chewing gum, early oral hydration and early mobilisation) on the intestinal motility following abdominal gynaecologic surgery

Author

Listed:
  • Fusun Terzioglu
  • Sevgi Şimsek
  • Kubra Karaca
  • Nilay Sariince
  • Pinar Altunsoy
  • Mehmet Coskun Salman

Abstract

Aims and objectives To determine the effects of chewing gum, early oral hydration and early mobilisation on the time of first bowel sounds, first passage of flatus and first defecation following abdominal gynaecologic surgery. Background A major complication of abdominal surgical procedures is paralytic ileus which results in patient discomfort, prolonged length of hospital stay and increased cost of treatment. Design Prospective randomised case–control study. Methods Women who underwent abdominal gynaecological surgery for benign disorders under general anaesthesia were randomised into eight groups according to different combinations of interventions consisting of chewing gum, early oral hydration and early mobilisation. The effects of these interventions on the time of first bowel sounds, first passage of flatus and first defecation following abdominal gynaecologic surgery were investigated. The data were analysed using chi‐square tests, t‐test for independent samples, Tukey's HSD test, pairwise comparison test, one‐way analysis of variance. Results It was found that the time when bowel sounds were heard was shorter, the time first passage of flatus was shorter and first defecation occurred earlier in the 1st group of women who chew gum, were hydrated orally and were mobilised early after surgery than the other groups. It was also determined that these periods were longest in the women who did not receive any intervention and received the routine hospital care when compared with other groups. Duration of hospital stay was shorter in the women who chew gum, were hydrated orally and were mobilised early than the other groups. Conclusions Early oral feeding, early mobilisation and chewing gum are effective methods in terms of preventing paralytic ileus following abdominal gynaecological surgery, improving patient comfort and shortening the duration of hospitalisation. Relevance to clinical practice Nurses may cause early recovery, improve the patient comfort, prevent paralytic ileus and shorten the duration of hospitalisation after gynaecologic abdominal surgery by recommending gum chewing, early mobilisation and early hydration.

Suggested Citation

  • Fusun Terzioglu & Sevgi Şimsek & Kubra Karaca & Nilay Sariince & Pinar Altunsoy & Mehmet Coskun Salman, 2013. "Multimodal interventions (chewing gum, early oral hydration and early mobilisation) on the intestinal motility following abdominal gynaecologic surgery," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(13-14), pages 1917-1925, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:13-14:p:1917-1925
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12172
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12172?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hagit Hochner & Sandi M Tenfelde & Wiessam Abu Ahmad & Michal Liebergall‐Wischnitzer, 2015. "Gum chewing and gastrointestinal function following caesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta‐analysis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(13-14), pages 1795-1804, July.
    2. Semra Akköz Çevik & Mürüvvet Başer, 2016. "Effect of bed exercises and gum chewing on abdominal sounds, flatulence and early discharge in the early period after caesarean section," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(9-10), pages 1416-1425, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:13-14:p:1917-1925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.