IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i1-2p180-191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Healthcare service provider perceptions of organisational communication across the perioperative pathway: a questionnaire survey

Author

Listed:
  • Sandra Braaf
  • Elizabeth Manias
  • Sue Finch
  • Robin Riley
  • Fiona Munro

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To gain understandings into service providers’ perceptions of organisational communication and identify areas for improvement across the perioperative pathway. Background. Effective communication among healthcare service providers is vital to the delivery of safe and quality patient care. Locally and internationally, research into sentinel and adverse events consistently demonstrate the perioperative environment and communication breakdown as recurring constituents in the generation of sentinel and adverse patient events. Design. Prospective cross‐sectional survey design. Methods. Using a whole population sampling method all service providers from across the perioperative pathway including surgeons, nurses, anaesthetists, theatre technicians, patient service assistants and receptionists were surveyed using the International Communication Association survey. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics, univariate analysis of variance and independent samples t‐tests. Results. In total, 281 service providers from the perioperative pathway of three Australian public hospitals completed the survey. Respondents were dissatisfied with communication from top management and service providers employed in an operating room or postanaesthetic care unit perceived the communication of information to be inadequate. Further, analysis by service providers’ occupation revealed nurses were less satisfied with channels of information than surgeons and anaesthetists were less satisfied with the timeliness of information than nurses. Conclusions. Restricted communication flow was evident as many areas of organisational communication were reported to be insufficient for the transmission of information. This research highlights the need for improved communication flow between service providers, and between management and service providers, working across the perioperative pathway. Relevance to clinical practice. Areas identified for communication improvement can be used to prevent communication failures and promote effective communication strategies such as meetings, education, providing time for open communication and developing organisational policy and procedures.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandra Braaf & Elizabeth Manias & Sue Finch & Robin Riley & Fiona Munro, 2013. "Healthcare service provider perceptions of organisational communication across the perioperative pathway: a questionnaire survey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(1-2), pages 180-191, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:1-2:p:180-191
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04228.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04228.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04228.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amalia Sillero Sillero & Neus Buil, 2021. "Enhancing Interprofessional Collaboration in Perioperative Setting from the Qualitative Perspectives of Physicians and Nurses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-11, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:1-2:p:180-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.