IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i9-10p1453-1465.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Workplace aggression experienced by frontline staff in dementia care

Author

Listed:
  • Anne‐Marie Boström
  • Janet E Squires
  • Agnes Mitchell
  • Anne E Sales
  • Carole A Estabrooks

Abstract

Aim. To describe the frequency of aggressive acts experienced by frontline staff working in two models of dementia care: Residential Alzheimer’s Care Centers and Secured Dementia Units and to explore the associations between aggressive acts experienced by frontline staff and factors related to the work context and care providers. Background. Aggression towards healthcare providers in residential long‐term care settings is well documented. However, few studies have examined associations between aggressive behaviours towards care providers and organisational factors. Design. A cross‐sectional survey. Method. The survey included demographic items and questions about aggressive acts experienced by staff and contextual factors. Analyses included: (1) descriptive statistics, (2) tests of difference (i.e. Student’s t‐test, Mann–Whitney U‐test, chi‐squared test and anova), (3) bivariate associations (i.e. Pearson and Spearman rank order correlations) and (4) multivariate linear regression. Results. Ninety‐one health care aides and licensed practical nurses working in four nursing units using two models of dementia care participated (response rate 81%). The most frequently reported types of aggression were physical assault (50% of staff, n = 45) and emotional abuse (48% of staff, n = 44). Aggressive acts were significantly associated with working in Secured Dementia Units rather than Residential Alzheimer’s Care Centers. Conclusions. Frontline staff working in Secured Dementia Units were exposed to higher frequencies of various types of aggressive acts mainly initiated by residents. Future research needs to explore modifiable workplace factors associated with aggressive acts in a larger sample across a variety of long‐term care settings. Relevance to clinical practice. To prevent staff perceived aggressive acts, leaders and managers in dementia care need to acknowledge the complex topic of workplace aggression and encourage an open discussion among frontline staff without assigning blame. Care provider strategies for dealing with aggressive behaviour have to be implemented in policies and clinical practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne‐Marie Boström & Janet E Squires & Agnes Mitchell & Anne E Sales & Carole A Estabrooks, 2012. "Workplace aggression experienced by frontline staff in dementia care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(9‐10), pages 1453-1465, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:9-10:p:1453-1465
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03924.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03924.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03924.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:9-10:p:1453-1465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.