IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i9-10p1293-1303.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Registered nurses’ attention to and perceptions of pressure ulcer prevention in hospital settings

Author

Listed:
  • Eva Sving
  • Lena Gunningberg
  • Marieann Högman
  • Anna‐Greta Mamhidir

Abstract

Aim. To describe how registered nurses perform, document and reflect on pressure ulcer prevention in a specific nurse–patient care situation, as well as generally, on hospital wards. Background. Registered nurses should provide safe and qualified pressure ulcer prevention, but pressure ulcers remain a problem. Compliance with evidence‐based guidelines impedes pressure ulcer formation. Design. A descriptive design with a multimethods approach. Method. Nine registered nurses at three wards and hospitals participated. The registered nurses were observed in a specific nurse–patient care situation with patients at risk for pressure ulcers. Interviews followed and patients’ records were reviewed. Quantitative and qualitative data analysis methods were used. Results. Pressure ulcer prevention performed by the registered nurses was dependent on the cultural care, which ranged from planned to unplanned prevention. Diversity was found in compliance with evidence‐based guidelines across the wards. Although all patients involved were at risk and the nurses described pressure ulcer prevention as basic care, the nurses’ attention to prevention was lacking. Few prevention activities and no structured risk assessments using risk assessment tools were observed, and few care plans were identified. The lack of attention was explained by registered nurses’ trust in assistant nurses’ knowledge, and prevention was seen as an assistant nurse task. Conclusion. Registered nurses paid little attention to pressure ulcer prevention among patients at risk. The planned and unplanned care structures affected the prevention. The nurses trusted and largely delegated their responsibility to the assistant nurses. Relevance to clinical practice. Evidence‐based pressure ulcer prevention is fundamental to patient safety. Care quality is created in situations where patients and care providers meet. How registered nurses work with pressure ulcer prevention, their role and communication, particularly with assistant nurses, should be of major concern to them as well as to healthcare managers.

Suggested Citation

  • Eva Sving & Lena Gunningberg & Marieann Högman & Anna‐Greta Mamhidir, 2012. "Registered nurses’ attention to and perceptions of pressure ulcer prevention in hospital settings," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(9‐10), pages 1293-1303, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:9-10:p:1293-1303
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.04000.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.04000.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.04000.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Consuelo Artero‐López & Verónica V. Márquez‐Hernández & María Teresa Estevez‐Morales & Genoveva Granados‐Gámez, 2018. "Inertia in nursing care of hospitalised patients with urinary incontinence," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1488-1496, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:9-10:p:1293-1303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.