IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i9-10p1274-1283.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk factors of pregnancy‐related lumbopelvic pain: a biopsychosocial approach

Author

Listed:
  • Hao‐Yuan Chang
  • Mark P Jensen
  • Ya‐Ling Yang
  • Chien‐Nan Lee
  • Yeur‐Hur Lai

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To examine the associations between pain‐related psychological and social factors and pregnancy‐related lumbopelvic pain intensity and interference after controlling biological factors. Background. Pregnancy‐related lumbopelvic pain is prevalent and has been shown to interfere with women’s quality of life. Although pain is a multidimensional phenomenon known to be influenced by psychosocial factors, the majority of previous research on this pregnancy‐related lumbopelvic pain has focused on biological factors. Design. Cross‐sectional correlational research. Method. A sample of 183 pregnant women with lumbopelvic pain was recruited from a medical center in northern Taiwan. Study participants provided demographic information and were administered the Brief Pain Inventory and a modified Catastrophising subscale of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire. Multiple regressions were used to examine the associations among the study variables. Results. Analyses indicated that lower education level was associated with higher pain intensity. Higher pain intensity during pregnancy and catastrophising cognitions were associated significantly with higher pain interference. Moreover, age moderated the strength of the association between pain intensity and pain interference. This association was stronger for older than for younger women. Conclusions. This study identified the psychosocial factors associated with pregnancy‐related lumbopelvic pain intensity (educational level) and interference (pain intensity and catastrophising) and also a variable (age) that moderated the association between pain intensity and pain interference. The findings support a biopsychosocial approach in understanding the experience and impact of pregnancy‐related lumbopelvic pain. Relevance to clinical practice. Nurses should assess pregnant clients’ age, educational level, pain intensity and pain catastrophising thoughts to help identify women who are more at risk for higher lumbopelvic pain intensity or interference. Women endorsing catastrophising cognitions should be referred to or provided with treatment to reduce the frequency of these cognitions that are known to have a negative impact on quality of life in other pain populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Hao‐Yuan Chang & Mark P Jensen & Ya‐Ling Yang & Chien‐Nan Lee & Yeur‐Hur Lai, 2012. "Risk factors of pregnancy‐related lumbopelvic pain: a biopsychosocial approach," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(9‐10), pages 1274-1283, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:9-10:p:1274-1283
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03895.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03895.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03895.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:9-10:p:1274-1283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.