IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i9-10p1232-1243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Postoperative pain experience and barriers to pain management in Chinese adult patients undergoing thoracic surgery

Author

Listed:
  • Hai Hui Yin
  • Mimi MY Tse
  • Frances KY Wong

Abstract

Aims. The purpose of this study was (1) to explore postoperative pain experience among Chinese thoracotomy patients during hospitalisation; (2) to identify patient‐related barriers to pain management; and (3) to explore how these barriers were related to patients’ pain experience. Background. Major thoracotomy causes severe pain and extreme stress for patients. Unrelieved postoperative pain leads to high risks of postoperative complications and chronic post‐thoracotomy pain syndrome, compromising the quality of life for those patients. Design. Cross‐sectional design. Methods. A tertiary general hospital in mainland China was selected for this study. A total of 94 patients undergoing scheduled major thoracotomy operations participated in the study. All patients completed Brief Pain Inventory‐Chinese version, the Barrier Questionnaire‐Taiwan Form Surgical version and a demographic questionnaire. Results. Patients suffered moderate to severe pain and experienced extremely high interferences with daily activities after major thoracotomy operation. Patients reported the four highest barrier scores in the subscale of Barrier Questionnaire‐Taiwan Form Surgical version were fear of tolerance, inhibition of wound healing, time intervals and distracting the physician from treating the disease. Patient’s demographic data had no significant impact on their concerns about communicating pain and using of analgesics with exception of the subscale ‘fatalism’ of the Barrier Questionnaire–Taiwan Form Surgical version in patients with higher education levels or patients with ‘non‐farmer’ occupation. However, there were no significant correlations indicated either between Barrier Questionnaire–Taiwan Form Surgical version score and pain severity or pain interference. Conclusions. Patients were underexposure of pain treatment after thoracotomy operation in the study, while patients’ concerns about reporting pain and using analgesics had minimal impacts on their pain experience. Relevance to clinical practice. Education approach for patients is inadequate to improve the status of unrelieved postoperative pain. Appropriate pain management regime together with attentive nursing care should be provided to achieve better pain relief for Chinese patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Hai Hui Yin & Mimi MY Tse & Frances KY Wong, 2012. "Postoperative pain experience and barriers to pain management in Chinese adult patients undergoing thoracic surgery," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(9‐10), pages 1232-1243, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:9-10:p:1232-1243
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03886.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03886.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03886.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:9-10:p:1232-1243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.