IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i7-8p1145-1154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying key performance indicators for nursing and midwifery care using a consensus approach

Author

Listed:
  • Tanya McCance
  • Lorna Telford
  • Julie Wilson
  • Olive MacLeod
  • Audrey Dowd

Abstract

Aims. The aim of this study was to gain consensus on key performance indicators that are appropriate and relevant for nursing and midwifery practice in the current policy context. Background. There is continuing demand to demonstrate effectiveness and efficiency in health and social care and to communicate this at boardroom level. Whilst there is substantial literature on the use of clinical indicators and nursing metrics, there is less evidence relating to indicators that reflect the patient experience. Design. A consensus approach was used to identify relevant key performance indicators. Methods. A nominal group technique was used comprising two stages: a workshop involving all grades of nursing and midwifery staff in two HSC trusts in Northern Ireland (n = 50); followed by a regional Consensus Conference (n = 80). During the workshop, potential key performance indicators were identified. This was used as the basis for the Consensus Conference, which involved two rounds of consensus. Analysis was based on aggregated scores that were then ranked. Results. Stage one identified 38 potential indicators and stage two prioritised the eight top‐ranked indicators as a core set for nursing and midwifery. The relevance and appropriateness of these indicators were confirmed with nurses and midwives working in a range of settings and from the perspective of service users. Conclusions. The eight indicators identified do not conform to the majority of other nursing metrics generally reported in the literature. Furthermore, they are strategically aligned to work on the patient experience and are reflective of the fundamentals of nursing and midwifery practice, with the focus on person‐centred care. Relevance to clinical practice. Nurses and midwives have a significant contribution to make in determining the extent to which these indicators are achieved in practice. Furthermore, measurement of such indicators provides an opportunity to evidence of the unique impact of nursing/midwifery care on the patient experience.

Suggested Citation

  • Tanya McCance & Lorna Telford & Julie Wilson & Olive MacLeod & Audrey Dowd, 2012. "Identifying key performance indicators for nursing and midwifery care using a consensus approach," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(7‐8), pages 1145-1154, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:7-8:p:1145-1154
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03820.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03820.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03820.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tanya McCance & Val Wilson & Kelly Kornman, 2016. "Paediatric International Nursing Study: using person‐centred key performance indicators to benchmark children's services," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(13-14), pages 2018-2027, July.
    2. Tanya McCance & Jack Hastings & Hilda Dowler, 2015. "Evaluating the use of key performance indicators to evidence the patient experience," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(21-22), pages 3084-3094, November.
    3. Jenny M Parr & Jeanette Bell & Jane Koziol‐McLain, 2018. "Evaluating fundamentals of care: The development of a unit‐level quality measurement and improvement programme," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2360-2372, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:7-8:p:1145-1154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.