IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i7-8p1014-1023.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Symptoms and uncertainty in breast cancer survivors in Korea: differences by treatment trajectory

Author

Listed:
  • Soo Hyun Kim
  • Ran Lee
  • Keon Suk Lee

Abstract

Aims. The study compared the levels of symptoms and uncertainty, their associated factors, relationships between them and predictors of uncertainty by treatment trajectory among breast cancer survivors. Background. Little is known with regard to how uncertainty and symptoms are related to treatment trajectory among breast cancer survivors. Design. A cross‐sectional descriptive design was used. Method. A total of 252 women with breast cancer, receiving cancer therapy, or having completed their therapy were recruited from the National Cancer Center in Korea. Measurements used included symptom subscales of the European Organization of Research and Therapy for Cancer QLQ‐C30 and Breast Cancer Module BR23 and the Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale. Results. Women in treatment reported more severe symptoms and higher levels of uncertainty than women having completed treatment. During treatment, most symptoms were positively correlated with the level of uncertainty, whereas, in women who had completed treatment, only dyspnoea, insomnia, systemic therapy side effects and arm symptoms positively correlated with uncertainty. There were also differences in predictors of uncertainty by treatment trajectory. Age, marital status and pain were significant predictors of uncertainty during treatment, while monthly income, dyspnoea and insomnia were predictors of uncertainty after treatment. Conclusions. Among breast cancer survivors, levels of symptoms and uncertainty, associated factors, relationships between them and predictors of uncertainty differed depending on treatment trajectory. Relevance to clinical practice. To provide trajectory‐sensitive nursing intervention for uncertainty among breast cancer survivors, age, marital status and pain should be considered during treatment, while factors such as economic status, dyspnoea and insomnia should be taken into account after treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Soo Hyun Kim & Ran Lee & Keon Suk Lee, 2012. "Symptoms and uncertainty in breast cancer survivors in Korea: differences by treatment trajectory," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(7‐8), pages 1014-1023, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:7-8:p:1014-1023
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03896.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03896.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03896.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wun-Yu You & Tzu-Pei Yeh & Kwo-Chen Lee & Wei-Fen Ma, 2020. "A Preliminary Study of the Comfort in Patients with Leukemia Staying in a Positive Pressure Isolation Room," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-10, May.
    2. Ji Yea Lee & Yeonsoo Jang & Sanghee Kim & Woo Jin Hyung, 2020. "Uncertainty and unmet care needs before and after surgery in patients with gastric cancer: A survey study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(2), pages 427-435, June.
    3. MoonKi Choi & JuHee Lee & Eui Geum Oh & Sang Hui Chu & Young H. Sohn & Chang Gi Park, 2020. "Factors Associated With Uncertainty in Illness Among People With Parkinson’s Disease," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 29(7), pages 469-478, September.
    4. Byeong Hee Jeon & Mona Choi & JuHee Lee & Sung Hoon Noh, 2016. "Relationships between gastrointestinal symptoms, uncertainty, and perceived recovery in patients with gastric cancer after gastrectomy," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), pages 23-29, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:7-8:p:1014-1023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.