IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i3-4p424-436.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Multidrug‐Resistant Bacteria Attitude Questionnaire: validity and understanding of responsibility for infection control in Swedish registered district, haematology and infection nurses

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Lindberg
  • Bernice Skytt
  • Marieann Högman
  • Marianne Carlsson

Abstract

Aim. To assess the discriminative and construct validity of the Multidrug‐Resistant Bacteria Attitude Questionnaire and to study registered nurses’ knowledge of, behaviour toward and emotional responses to patients with multidrug‐resistant bacteria in relation to how they understand their own, managers’ and politicians’ responsibility for adherence to preventive measures for infection control. Background. Multidrug‐resistant organisms are a global problem and an essential topic in healthcare regarding patient safety improvement. Design. Descriptive and correlational cross‐sectional survey. Method. Data were collected in a non‐random sample consisting of 397 registered nurses; district, haematology or infection registered nurses. One‐way analysis of variance and independent t‐tests were used for comparisons and a principal component analysis was performed. Results. Discriminative and construct validity were supported, as the infection registered nurses generally had higher scores on knowledge, behaviour and emotional response, compared with district registered nurses and haematology registered nurses and the three‐factor solution was confirmed. Registered nurses with higher scores on knowledge and emotional response attributed greater responsibility to themselves and to politicians. The Multidrug‐Resistant Bacteria Attitude Questionnaire was translated using a forward‐back translation process. Conclusion. The questionnaire has adequate psychometric properties. Insufficient knowledge of, behaviour toward and emotional response to patients with multidrug‐resistant bacteria were described, but the registered nurses did estimate their own responsibility for adherence to preventive measures for infection control as being great or very great. Relevance to clinical practice. There is a considerable need to improve knowledge, behaviour and emotional response regarding infection prevention measures among healthcare workers. The hospital management are responsible for such improvements and the Multidrug‐Resistant Bacteria Attitude Questionnaire is useful in identifying such needs, as it has adequate psychometric properties and is able to discriminate between groups. Evaluation among healthcare workers may indicate where to situate additional training, as this is of clinical significance for safe care.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Lindberg & Bernice Skytt & Marieann Högman & Marianne Carlsson, 2012. "The Multidrug‐Resistant Bacteria Attitude Questionnaire: validity and understanding of responsibility for infection control in Swedish registered district, haematology and infection nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(3‐4), pages 424-436, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:3-4:p:424-436
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03914.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03914.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03914.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:3-4:p:424-436. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.