IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i23-24p3523-3531.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Observing pain management practice on a medical unit following changes arising from an action research study

Author

Listed:
  • Julie Gregory
  • Heather Waterman

Abstract

Aim. To describe pain assessment practice within a medical unit, to identify factors that may affect the assessment of pain and evaluate changes in practice. Background. Pain is a problem for patients in all areas of a hospital, but its assessment and management on medical units had not been investigated. An initial assessment of practice found that pain was not consistently assessed and managed on the unit. A variety of activities have been employed during an action research study to change pain management practice. Method. Naturalistic unstructured participant observation of nurses and structured patient interviews were conducted. Results. The need to communicate with many people led to interruptions, multi‐tasking and practical problems were observed which appeared to affect the provision of nursing care, in particular, the administration of medications. These factors also prevented a comprehensive assessment of pain, although the assessment of pain intensity appeared to have increased. Discussion. The constant activity and interruptions observed may make it difficult for patients to discuss their experience of pain in detail. These accepted, every day and taken‐for‐granted aspects of nursing observed appeared to reduce opportunities for comprehensive pain assessment. Conclusion. Pain assessment is one of a number of nursing activities, obtaining a pain score appears to have become routine practice. Nursing takes place in a complex environment, which may disrupt the provision of nursing care and impede communication. Relevance to practice. To increase nurses awareness of the complexity of every day practice, the numerous tasks required, interruptions to the provision of care and the resultant effect on pain assessment and management. They need to then identify and reflect on these factors prior to attempting to change their practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Julie Gregory & Heather Waterman, 2012. "Observing pain management practice on a medical unit following changes arising from an action research study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(23-24), pages 3523-3531, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:23-24:p:3523-3531
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04096.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04096.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04096.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Susan G Hopkinson & Debra L Wiegand, 2017. "The culture contributing to interruptions in the nursing work environment: An ethnography," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 5093-5102, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:23-24:p:3523-3531. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.