IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i23-24p3504-3512.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing bias against overweight individuals among nursing and psychology students: an implicit association test

Author

Listed:
  • Tabitha Waller
  • Claudia Lampman
  • Gwen Lupfer‐Johnson

Abstract

Aim and objectives. To determine the implicit or unconscious attitudes of Nursing and Psychology majors towards overweight individuals in medical and non‐medical contexts. Background. Obesity is a leading health concern today, which impacts both physical and psychological health. Overweight individuals confront social biases in many aspects of their lives including health care. Examining the views of Nursing and Psychology students may reveal implicit attitudes towards overweight individuals that may lead to prejudiced behaviours. Design. A mixed design experiment with one between‐subjects variable (student major: Nursing or Psychology) and one within‐subjects variable (condition: congruent or incongruent) was used to assess implicit attitudes in two convenience samples of Nursing and Psychology students. Methods. A computerised implicit association test was used to determine implicit attitudes towards overweight individuals in medical and non‐medical contexts. A total of 90 students from Nursing (n = 45) and Psychology (n = 45) were recruited to complete an implicit association test. Reaction times in milliseconds between the congruent trials (stereotype consistent) and incongruent trials (stereotype inconsistent) were compared with determine adherence to social stereotypes or weight bias. Results. A statistically significant implicit bias towards overweight individuals was detected in both subject groups and in both target settings (medical vs. non‐medical). Stronger weight bias was found when the stimulus targets were female than male. Conclusions. Findings from this study expand understanding of the implicit attitudes and social biases of Nursing and Psychology students. The views held by these future healthcare professionals may negatively impact patient care. Relevance to clinical practice. Providing education and support to overweight individuals is central to Nursing practice in a society struggling to manage obesity. Negative stereotypes or beliefs about these individuals may result in poor patient care. Therefore, nurses and other healthcare professionals must be aware of personal biases and work to develop methods to address weight‐related issues in a therapeutic manner.

Suggested Citation

  • Tabitha Waller & Claudia Lampman & Gwen Lupfer‐Johnson, 2012. "Assessing bias against overweight individuals among nursing and psychology students: an implicit association test," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(23-24), pages 3504-3512, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:23-24:p:3504-3512
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04226.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04226.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04226.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anne Tanneberger & Cristina Ciupitu-Plath, 2018. "Nurses’ Weight Bias in Caring for Obese Patients: Do Weight Controllability Beliefs Influence the Provision of Care to Obese Patients?," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 27(4), pages 414-432, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:23-24:p:3504-3512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.