IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i23-24p3361-3371.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pain management and satisfaction in postsurgical patients

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer Tocher
  • Sheila Rodgers
  • Margaret AC Smith
  • Deborah Watt
  • Lesley Dickson

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To examine the relationship between patient satisfaction and the incidence of severe and enduring pain through a health board wide hospital satisfaction questionnaire. Background. The incidence and management of acute postoperative pain and its relationship to patient satisfaction have been of great interest to clinicians over the last 20 years. Evidence suggests that despite many moves to address this problem with the advent of acute pain nurse specialists and dedicated pain teams, severe and enduring pain continues to be a problem. However, patients appear to report high satisfaction levels. Design. The study design was a postal questionnaire the results of which were analysed statistically. Methods. The postal questionnaire was sent to patients who had been discharged from acute hospitals in one health board in the previous two weeks. A total of three large acute hospitals were included. The data were analysed to produce descriptive statistics for all patients on the pain questions and then for patients with severe and enduring pain on the variables of age, gender, ethnic group, responses to pain questions and type of admission. Results. Twenty‐six percent of patients reported having pain all or most of the time. Patients suffering from severe and enduring pain were younger females. Conclusion. Acute postoperative pain continues to be a problem, although patients continue reporting moderate satisfaction levels. Relevance to clinical practice. Acute postoperative pain is an ongoing issue for postsurgical patients. It is crucial to understand and recognise issues that can adversely contribute to increased pain severity.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer Tocher & Sheila Rodgers & Margaret AC Smith & Deborah Watt & Lesley Dickson, 2012. "Pain management and satisfaction in postsurgical patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(23-24), pages 3361-3371, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:23-24:p:3361-3371
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04253.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04253.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04253.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cafer Özdemir & Ebru Karazeybek & Yetkin Söyüncü, 2022. "Relationship Between Quality of Care and Patient Care Outcomes for Postoperative Pain in Major Orthopedic Surgery: Analytical and Cross-Sectional Study," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 31(3), pages 530-540, March.
    2. Laserina O Connor, 2016. "Developing ‘subject matter experts’: an improvement methodology programme for acute postoperative pain with patients post major surgery," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(17-18), pages 2629-2638, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:23-24:p:3361-3371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.