IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i21-22p3047-3060.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health outcomes and quality of life of residents of shared‐housing arrangements compared to residents of special care units – results of the Berlin DeWeGE‐study

Author

Listed:
  • Karin Wolf‐Ostermann
  • Andreas Worch
  • Thomas Fischer
  • Ines Wulff
  • Johannes Gräske

Abstract

Aims and objectives To compare different health outcomes as well as quality of life (QoL) between people with dementia living in shared‐housing arrangements (SHA) and special care units (SCU) in nursing homes. Background Often situated in large apartments in mostly urban settings, SHA are a specific German kind of small‐scale living facilities for older care‐dependent persons, predominantly suffering from dementia. SHA are completely disconnected from traditional nursing homes. Design In a longitudinal design, all new residents of SHA and SCU suffering with dementia in Berlin were surveyed for one year. They were assessed when they moved into the SHA or SCU and again 6 and 12 months later. Methods We surveyed physical and psychological health outcomes including ADL‐functioning (Barthel), neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia (NPI) and challenging behaviour (Cohen‐Mansfield agitation inventory) as well as QoL (Qualidem). Results Fifty‐six persons (43 women, 13 men) were recruited into the longitudinal study. The average age was 82·5 years at admission, participants mostly had a moderate level of cognitive impairment (mean Mini Mental State Examination = 13·3), prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms was high. During the one‐year follow‐up, analyses show a significant decrease in cognitive abilities but also of neuropsychiatric symptoms in both groups. In SHA, QoL increases on average during the one‐year study period. Conclusions Both types of facilities attract slightly different populations according to our data. Comparison of SHA residents to SCU residents documented no significant beneficial effects of settings in terms of health outcomes. Relevance to clinical practice As no clear advantage of either SHA or SCU in nursing homes can be demonstrated for residents with dementia who move in newly, it is impossible to give a clear evidence‐based recommendation and the decision for one setting or the other can be made according solely to personal preference of the resident.

Suggested Citation

  • Karin Wolf‐Ostermann & Andreas Worch & Thomas Fischer & Ines Wulff & Johannes Gräske, 2012. "Health outcomes and quality of life of residents of shared‐housing arrangements compared to residents of special care units – results of the Berlin DeWeGE‐study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(21-22), pages 3047-3060, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:21-22:p:3047-3060
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04305.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04305.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04305.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:21-22:p:3047-3060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.