IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i21-22p3037-3046.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determination of older people’s level of loneliness

Author

Listed:
  • Zeliha Koc

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To determine levels of loneliness of individuals aged 60 and above. Background. Loneliness stands out as a social problem observed amongst old individuals living in both urban and rural areas. Design. Descriptive study. Methods. A total of 330 individuals aged 60 and above who visited a local health care centre at Sinop, Turkey, because of various health problems are included in the research. Data were collected using a questionnaire that determines the patients’ socio‐demographics and clinic specifications and uses the UCLA Loneliness Scale, Satisfaction with Life Scale and the instrumental activities of daily living list. For data analysis, percentage calculation, one‐way anova, the student t‐test and regression analysis were used. Results. It has been determined that older people’s UCLA Loneliness Scale point average is 47·3 ± 8·6; most of them (49·1%) were seen to have a middle‐level loneliness point. Older people’s Satisfaction with Life Scale point average has been determined as 12·7 ± 6·8. There is no statistically meaningful relationship between older people’s life‐satisfaction score average and socio‐demographic and clinical specifications (p > 0·05). Older people’s points in IADL are 18·8 ± 7·6. Most of them are independent in terms of fulfilment of the instrumental activities. Conclusions. In the study, when compared with the other groups, loneliness point averages were found significantly higher for men, those who had never married, primary school graduates, the childless, those who lived alone, those had a chronic disease or those who used continual medication. Relevance to clinical practice. The social and health care systems need to recognise and address loneliness problems amongst older people. It is important to develop and test new interventions aimed at alleviating loneliness.

Suggested Citation

  • Zeliha Koc, 2012. "Determination of older people’s level of loneliness," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(21-22), pages 3037-3046, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:21-22:p:3037-3046
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04277.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04277.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04277.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:21-22:p:3037-3046. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.