IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i17-18p2626-2635.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Living through gynaecological cancer: three typologies

Author

Listed:
  • Ragnhild JT Sekse
  • Målfrid Råheim
  • Gunnhild Blåka
  • Eva Gjengedal

Abstract

Aims and objectives. The aim of this qualitative study is to highlight how women experienced living through gynaecological cancer. Background. The increasing number of long‐term survivors after cancer has created a greater need for knowledge about how patients live through the illness. Design. A qualitative design, with a phenomenological–hermeneutical perspective, provided the framework for the study. Method. Thirty‐two unstructured in‐depth interviews with 16 women were conducted. Each woman was interviewed twice: one year apart, and five and six years after treatment, respectively. Stepwise meaning condensation was used to analyse the data. Results. Based on the women’s first‐hand stories about their experiences with cancer, we identified three typologies, describing different ways in which the women negotiated encountering and living through cancer. These typologies are the emotion‐ and relationship‐oriented women, the activity‐oriented women and the self‐controlled women. Conclusions. There are substantial differences regarding how women process the experience of cancer. The findings add valuable knowledge about the impact cancer can have on women’s lives and can be of help for nurses who support patients during treatment and follow‐up. Relevance to clinical practice. Understanding different ways women can experience living through cancer is fundamental for the development and improvement of cancer care. Allowing time for the women to talk with nurses about their cancer experiences could be essential during treatment and follow‐up. Nurses can support the women by listening to their stories, accepting their emotions and informing them in detail. The findings in this study imply that strengthening nurses’ listening and conversational competence can be of importance for supporting patients after cancer. By building on the women’s own stories, it might be possible to create a follow‐up process that is individually tailored for each cancer patient.

Suggested Citation

  • Ragnhild JT Sekse & Målfrid Råheim & Gunnhild Blåka & Eva Gjengedal, 2012. "Living through gynaecological cancer: three typologies," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(17‐18), pages 2626-2635, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:17-18:p:2626-2635
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.04028.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.04028.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.04028.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Malene Missel & Mette Hansen & Rie Jackson & Mette Siemsen & Mai Nanna Schønau, 2018. "Re‐embodying eating after surgery for oesophageal cancer: Patients' lived experiences of participating in an education and counselling nutritional intervention," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1420-1430, April.
    2. Rikke Guldager & Karen Willis & Kristian Larsen & Ingrid Poulsen, 2019. "Relatives’ strategies in subacute brain injury rehabilitation: The warrior, the observer and the hesitant," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1-2), pages 289-299, January.
    3. Ragnhild Johanne Tveit Sekse & Gail Dunberger & Mette Linnet Olesen & Maria Østerbye & Lene Seibæk, 2019. "Lived experiences and quality of life after gynaecological cancer—An integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1393-1421, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:17-18:p:2626-2635. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.