IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i17-18p2617-2625.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Falls in old age: a threat to identity

Author

Listed:
  • Joanne Dollard
  • Christopher Barton
  • Jonathan Newbury
  • Deborah Turnbull

Abstract

Aim and objective. This study aimed to understand older people’s perceptions of their and other older peoples’ falls risk, to increase understanding of why older people might not believe falls are relevant to themselves. Background. One‐third of the people aged ≥65 years (older people) fall yearly. Many older people do not participate in falls prevention programmes because they purport they are not personally vulnerable. Design. A qualitative study was conducted, guided by the tenets of grounded theory. Method. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with nine community‐dwelling older people living in metropolitan Adelaide, South Australia. The interview explored participant’s direct and indirect experience of falling, their perceived chance of falling in the next 12 months and that of others of the same age and sex to themselves and their reasons for this. Results. Participants carefully presented themselves as being ‘not the type who fall’, who they view negatively. They believed their or their friends past or future falls were (or could be) because of factors outside of their personal control or because they were not paying attention at that moment of falling, as opposed to being the type of person who falls. They used these explanations as strategies to maintain or protect their identity as being physically competent. Conclusions. Older people know that falling can be viewed negatively. Falling is a threat to their identity as the type of person who does not fall. This explanation is consistent with self‐presentation theory, where people use accounting strategies in social interaction to create a desired impression. Relevance to clinical practice. Falls prevention messages are likely to be rejected if the target group associate the message with a negative identity. These findings can assist nurses to understand older people’s reluctance to engage in falls prevention and can stimulate thinking regarding alternative engagement strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Joanne Dollard & Christopher Barton & Jonathan Newbury & Deborah Turnbull, 2012. "Falls in old age: a threat to identity," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(17‐18), pages 2617-2625, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:17-18:p:2617-2625
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03990.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03990.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03990.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stephanie Gettens & Paul Fulbrook & Melanie Jessup & Nancy Low Choy, 2018. "The patients’ perspective of sustaining a fall in hospital: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 743-752, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:17-18:p:2617-2625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.