IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i17-18p2590-2598.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tinkering and tailoring individual consultations: how practice nurses try to make cardiovascular risk communication meaningful

Author

Listed:
  • Sue Boase
  • Dan Mason
  • Stephen Sutton
  • Simon Cohn

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To explore the perspectives of practice nurses in their role of communicating cardiovascular risk to patients. Background. Nurses in primary care have for some time been engaged in cardiovascular risk discussions with patients. With the recent introduction of the NHS Health Checks, the focus on this work is set to increase. Design. Qualitative using a framework approach. Methods. Two focus groups and 16 semi‐structured interviews were conducted with nurses purposively sampled from those working in primary care. Results. The nurses’ accounts revealed the need to develop a relationship of trust and establish a level of relevance with each individual patient whilst discussing cardiovascular risk. Potential aspects of these discussions were as follows: working within a highly structured data‐collecting task; time constraints and consideration of the individual’s context. We used the idea of tailoring to describe how nurses navigate and constantly modify and pitch their approach for each patient they see in response to these constraints. Conclusion. We suggest that in order for risk to be made meaningful to patients, practice nurses recognise the need for such information to be embedded in the more reciprocal dynamics of nurse‐patient consultations. From their perspective, success is often as much about not saying something, or saying it in a particular way, as saying anything accurately or consistently. Relevance to clinical practice. For practice nurses to be instrumental in the successful delivery of health prevention policy initiatives such as the NHS Health Checks, it is important to acknowledge their views and perspectives in undertaking this work. This study suggests that the nurses recognised the need for further skills and a refinement of approach for those health professionals involved.

Suggested Citation

  • Sue Boase & Dan Mason & Stephen Sutton & Simon Cohn, 2012. "Tinkering and tailoring individual consultations: how practice nurses try to make cardiovascular risk communication meaningful," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(17‐18), pages 2590-2598, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:17-18:p:2590-2598
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04167.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04167.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04167.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anders Broström & Amir H Pakpour & Martin Ulander & Per Nilsen, 2018. "Development and psychometric evaluation of the Swedish propensity to achieve healthy lifestyle scale in patients with hypertension," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(21-22), pages 4040-4049, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:17-18:p:2590-2598. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.