IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i17-18p2555-2566.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The ceremonial order of public health nursing consultations: an ethnographic study

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Clancy

Abstract

Aims. To explore public health nursing consultations by providing reflections on the overt interaction between public health nurses, parents and young people during consultations. Background. There is limited research on public health nursing strategies and intervention models. There is a need to observe and describe the content of public health nursing work. Design. The study has an ethnographic design and this article focuses mainly on the observations. Methods. Five consultations at four different child health clinics, six consultations at two health clinics for young people and one consultation at the school public health nurse’s office were observed. The sociological concept of role formats provides the analytical focus for the paper. Results. There are differences between the overriding ceremonial order in the public health nursing consultations observed in this study and the dominant role format observed in Sociologist P.M. Strong’s study of medical consultations. Gentility can be a common denominator, yet ease and focus on everyday issues seems consistent with public health nursing consultations. The ‘personal professional format’ seems to be the correct term for the overriding ceremonial order. Conclusion. The outward show of behaviour in nursing and medical consultations differs. Despite society’s increased bureaucracy within health care systems, ease and a personal professional approach, not a rigid bureaucratic format, seems to be the dominant ceremonial order in public health nursing consultations. Relevance to clinical practice. This study is relevant to clinical nursing practice as it can create awareness of the taken‐for‐granted subtleties in nursing consultations. The findings show the continued need for supportive universal services that focus on the everyday needs of parents, young people and families. The findings also reveal the need for further studies on the moral underpinnings of public health nursing practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Clancy, 2012. "The ceremonial order of public health nursing consultations: an ethnographic study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(17‐18), pages 2555-2566, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:17-18:p:2555-2566
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.04024.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.04024.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.04024.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anne Clancy & Patricia Leahy-Warren & Mary Rose Day & Helen Mulcahy, 2013. "Primary Health Care: Comparing Public Health Nursing Models in Ireland and Norway," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2013, pages 1-9, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:17-18:p:2555-2566. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.