IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i15-16p2316-2326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indigenous hospital experiences: a New Zealand case study

Author

Listed:
  • Denise Wilson
  • Pipi Barton

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To explore Māori (Indigenous people of New Zealand) experiences of hospitalisation in surgical or medical settings and how these might influence length of stay. Background. Globally Indigenous peoples with histories of colonisation suffer health disparities compared with other groups. They experience higher levels of morbidity, premature mortality, lower life expectancies and differential access, use and quality of health services. In Indigenous communities’ negative anecdotal accounts of hospital experiences indicate more research is needed about their hospital experiences. Design. A Māori (Indigenous) centered approach using case study methodology and three data sources: medical‐surgical discharge data, interviews with Māori and a literature review. Method. Using statistical data from the New Zealand Health Information Service from 1989–2006, a retrospective interrupted time series design was used to examine length of stay for Māori patients in medical and surgical hospital settings. Semi‐structured interviews with 11 participants identifying as Māori who had experienced hospitalisation in a medical or surgical setting were transcribed and thematically analysed. A structured review of the research literature on Indigenous hospital experiences was also analysed. These data were analysed individually, triangulated and interpreted. Results. Māori consistently have a shorter average length of stay than non‐Māori using public hospitals in New Zealand. Marginalisation of Indigenous peoples in public hospitals was evident in both the interviews undertaken and the literature reviewed. Participants believed hospitals were not conducive to healing and negative experiences contributed to decisions to seek an early discharge. Conclusions. Given the disparities in Indigenous health status, health professionals can address negative hospitalisation experiences by attending to the quality of care delivered and nature of the hospital environment. Relevance to cinical practice. Nurses can play an important role improving health outcome disparities for Indigenous peoples linked to health service delivery, especially the delivery of culturally responsive and quality nursing care.

Suggested Citation

  • Denise Wilson & Pipi Barton, 2012. "Indigenous hospital experiences: a New Zealand case study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(15‐16), pages 2316-2326, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:15-16:p:2316-2326
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.04042.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.04042.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.04042.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Denise Wilson & Vanessa Heaslip & Debra Jackson, 2018. "Improving equity and cultural responsiveness with marginalised communities: Understanding competing worldviews," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(19-20), pages 3810-3819, October.
    2. Per Axelsson & Tahu Kukutai & Rebecca Kippen, 2016. "The field of Indigenous health and the role of colonisation and history," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-7, March.
    3. Cathleen Aspinall & Jenny M. Parr & Julia Slark & Denise Wilson, 2020. "The culture conversation: Report from the 2nd Australasian ILC meeting—Auckland 2019," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(11-12), pages 1768-1773, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:15-16:p:2316-2326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.