IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i15-16p2136-2148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tracking the route to sustainability: a service evaluation tool for an advance care planning model developed for community palliative care services

Author

Listed:
  • Jeanine Blackford
  • Annette Street

Abstract

Aims and objectives. The study aim was to develop a service evaluation tool for an advance care planning model implemented in community palliative care. Background. Internationally, advance care planning programmes usually measure success by completion rate of advance directives or plans. This outcome measure provides little information to assist nurse managers to embed advance care planning into usual care and measure their performance and quality over time. An evaluation tool was developed to address this need in Australian community palliative care services. Design. Multisite action research approach. Methods. Three community palliative care services located in Victoria, Australia, participated. Qualitative and quantitative data collection strategies were used to develop the Advance Care Planning‐Service Evaluation Tool. Results. The Advance Care Planning‐Service Evaluation Tool identified advance care planning progress over time across three stages of Establishment, Consolidation and Sustainability within previously established Model domains of governance, documentation, practice, education, quality improvement and community engagement. The tool was used by nurses either as a peer‐assessment or self‐assessment tool that assisted services to track their implementation progress as well as plan further change strategies. Conclusion. The Advance Care Planning‐Service Evaluation Tool was useful to nurse managers in community palliative care. It provided a clear outline of service progress, level of achievement and provided clear direction for planning future changes. Relevance to clinical practice. The Advance Care Planning‐Service Evaluation Tool enables nurses in community palliative care to monitor, evaluate and plan quality improvement of their advance care planning model to improve end‐of‐life care. As the tool describes generic healthcare processes, there is potential transferability of the tool to other types of services.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeanine Blackford & Annette Street, 2012. "Tracking the route to sustainability: a service evaluation tool for an advance care planning model developed for community palliative care services," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(15‐16), pages 2136-2148, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:15-16:p:2136-2148
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04179.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04179.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04179.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sarah Jeong & Seok Ohr & Jacqueline Pich & Peter Saul & Alan Ho, 2015. "‘Planning ahead’ among community‐dwelling older people from culturally and linguistically diverse background: a cross‐sectional survey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(1-2), pages 244-255, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:15-16:p:2136-2148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.