IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i13-14p2054-2063.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Surviving, not thriving: a qualitative study of newly qualified midwives’ experience of their transition to practice

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer Fenwick
  • Athena Hammond
  • Jane Raymond
  • Rachel Smith
  • Joanne Gray
  • Maralyn Foureur
  • Caroline Homer
  • Andrew Symon

Abstract

Aim and objectives. The study explored the experiences of newly qualified midwives and described the factors that facilitated or constrained their development during the transition from student to registered midwife. Background. Knowledge of the transition to midwifery practice remains limited. Design and Method. A qualitative descriptive approach was used. Sixteen graduates from one Australian University participated in a tape‐recorded interview. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data set. Results. The metaphor of ‘The Pond’, an environment that consists of layers of life and can be both clear and peaceful or murky and infested, was used to describe new midwives perceptions of the context and culture of hospital‐based maternity care. For some, ‘The Pond’ was a harsh environment that often became toxic. The ‘Life‐raft’ metaphor was used to describe the importance of midwife‐to‐midwife relationships. The theme of ‘Swimming’ captured the consequence of positive interactions with colleagues and a supportive environment, whilst ‘Sinking’ described the consequence of poor relationships with midwives and a difficult working environment. Conclusion. The study highlights the importance of positive midwife‐to‐midwife relationships on the transition from student to registered midwife. There was also evidence that continuity with women and midwifery colleagues enhanced confidence and restored faith in normal birth. At the same time, it was clear that the midwifery culture of some institutions remains highly contested with midwives struggling to provide woman‐centred care and often challenged by the risk‐averse nature of maternity care. Relevance to Clinical Practice. Whilst further work is required, the findings provide a deeper understanding of individual midwives’ transition period. The importance of forming longitudinal relationships not only with women but with midwifery colleagues is highlighted. Developing continuity models that adequately support graduates and student’s needs are likely to assist in addressing practices issues in both the academic and clinical setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer Fenwick & Athena Hammond & Jane Raymond & Rachel Smith & Joanne Gray & Maralyn Foureur & Caroline Homer & Andrew Symon, 2012. "Surviving, not thriving: a qualitative study of newly qualified midwives’ experience of their transition to practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(13-14), pages 2054-2063, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:13-14:p:2054-2063
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04090.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04090.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04090.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Clare Harvey & Desley Hegney & Agnieszka Sobolewska & Diane Chamberlain & Elspeth Wood & Lisa Wirihana & Sandy Mclellan & Joyce Hendricks & Troy Wake, 2019. "Developing a community-based nursing and midwifery career pathway – A narrative systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:13-14:p:2054-2063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.