IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i13-14p2044-2053.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring nurses’ experiences of prescribing in secondary care: informing future education and practice

Author

Listed:
  • Jane Scrafton
  • John McKinnon
  • Roslyn Kane

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To explore the experiences of secondary care nurse prescribers to establish how prescribing is employed and what its benefits and disadvantages are perceived to be. Background. Nurse prescribing has developed rapidly since it inception almost 20 years ago and there is a significant body of research evaluating its implementation in primary care. Recent expansion of non‐medical prescribing rights has prompted nurses in secondary care establishments to become prescribers. Evaluation of nurse prescribing in this new environment is required, if practice is to be informed and advanced. The lack of such evaluations in the published literature was the impetus for this study. Design. A cross‐sectional qualitative study. Methods. A convenience sample of nurse prescribers was interviewed using a single broad question to prompt elaboration. Transcribed interviews were analysed using Colaizzi’s procedural steps. Results. Three main themes emerged from the analysis: motivations behind becoming a nurse prescriber; benefits and limitations of prescribing education and continuing professional development and prescribing in practice. Conclusion. Nurses felt nurse prescribing offers clear benefits in relation to patient care. Where nurses were not prescribing, finance arrangements between different NHS trusts appear to be a significant barrier to its successful implementation of prescribing in practice. Nurse prescribing is strongly believed to be the domain of the experienced nurse. There is a clear need for ongoing evaluation of all aspects of nurse prescribing. Relevance to clinical practice. This paper makes key recommendations on the future development and delivery of programmes of education for nurse prescribers and for the delivery of safe and effective prescribing in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Jane Scrafton & John McKinnon & Roslyn Kane, 2012. "Exploring nurses’ experiences of prescribing in secondary care: informing future education and practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(13-14), pages 2044-2053, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:13-14:p:2044-2053
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.04050.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.04050.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.04050.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kinga Harpula & Anna Bartosiewicz, 2022. "Factors Influencing Nurses’ Opinions on the Implementation of Nursing Advice in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-9, June.
    2. Roisin Lennon & Anne Fallon, 2018. "The experiences of being a registered nurse prescriber within an acute service setting," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 523-534, February.
    3. Hanna Hopia & Anne Karhunen & Johanna Heikkilä, 2017. "Growth of nurse prescribing competence: facilitators and barriers during education," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(19-20), pages 3164-3173, October.
    4. Agnieszka Zimmermann & Ewa Cieplikiewicz & Piotr Wąż & Aleksandra Gaworska-Krzemińska & Paweł Olczyk, 2020. "The Implementation Process of Nurse Prescribing in Poland – A Descriptive Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-18, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:13-14:p:2044-2053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.