IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i13-14p1896-1905.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond the ‘tick and flick’: facilitating best practice falls prevention through an action research approach

Author

Listed:
  • Emma Lea
  • Sharon Andrews
  • Keith Hill
  • Terry Haines
  • Jennifer Nitz
  • Betty Haralambous
  • Kirsten Moore
  • Andrew Robinson

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To examine residential aged care facility staff views on using falls risk assessment tools and the implications for developing falls prevention practices in the context of an action research project. Background. Falls risk assessments play an important role in care planning by identifying and monitoring aged care facility residents most at risk of falls. Yet while such assessments are recommended in falls prevention best practice guidelines, there is little published research that examines staff procedures and views related to conducting falls risk assessments. Design. Falls risk assessments were undertaken in the context of an action research project. Method. Twelve staff members from two residential aged care facilities (RACFs) in Tasmania formed a single Falls Action Research Group, which met 22 times over a year, providing the study’s qualitative data. During this time, key group members assessed 178 residents using a new falls risk assessment tool (FROP‐Resi). Results. According to group members, facilities evolved from a ‘tick‐and‐flick’ approach to falls risk assessment to a more individualised, face‐to‐face assessment process. Group members perceived the process to be more meaningful and enjoyable for staff involved in the assessment process resulting in higher quality of assessments and leading to improved levels of falls awareness among staff, residents and family caregivers. Conclusions. An action research process is useful for facilitating a new approach to falls risk assessments, engaging aged care facility staff with falls prevention and prompting improvements in falls prevention practices. Relevance to clinical practice. RACFs need to provide opportunities for staff to meet regularly to discuss practice, identify issues and take action. By doing so, staff can engage meaningfully with best practice activities such as optimising falls risk assessment processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Emma Lea & Sharon Andrews & Keith Hill & Terry Haines & Jennifer Nitz & Betty Haralambous & Kirsten Moore & Andrew Robinson, 2012. "Beyond the ‘tick and flick’: facilitating best practice falls prevention through an action research approach," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(13-14), pages 1896-1905, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:13-14:p:1896-1905
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04121.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04121.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04121.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emma J Lea & Sharon Andrews & Megan Stronach & Annette Marlow & Andrew L Robinson, 2017. "Using action research to build mentor capacity to improve orientation and quality of nursing students’ aged care placements: what to do when the phone rings," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(13-14), pages 1893-1905, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:13-14:p:1896-1905. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.