IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i13-14p1847-1858.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Needs of adult patients in intensive care units of Estonian hospitals: a questionnaire survey

Author

Listed:
  • Ilme Aro
  • Anna‐Maija Pietilä
  • Katri Vehviläinen‐Julkunen

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To describe the intensive care unit patients’ perceptions about the importance of their different needs and how their needs are met in Estonian hospitals, and to determine the correlations between the patients’ perceptions and their demographic characteristics and background variables. Background. Meeting needs of patients in intensive care unit is important for avoiding unpleasant experiences and providing patient‐centred care. Design. A descriptive questionnaire survey. Methods. The study was performed in sixteen intensive care units (ICUs) in six acute care hospitals in Estonia. Data were collected over six months in 2008 using the structured five‐point scale questionnaire Needs of Adult Patients in Intensive Care Unit. The Convenience sample consisted of The adult patients discharged from ICUs to hospital wards able to answer the questionnaire (n = 166). Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, correlation analysis and statistical tests. Results. Patients’ needs varied and were sometimes unmet. The most important needs were physical comfort and feeling safe. Privacy, involvement of family and friends and being involved in decision‐making were less important. The more important a need was perceived to be, the better it was met. The need for physical comfort was met best, involvement in decision‐making worst. Patients with lower educational level and unscheduled patients agreed more that their needs were met. The better the patients considered their condition when leaving the ICU, the more they agreed that their needs were met. Conclusions. The findings provide a basis for understanding the needs of critically ill adults in Estonian ICUs to provide them more patient‐centred care and improve their psychological well‐being and quality of life after discharge. Relevance to clinical practice. Identifying and acknowledging the personal needs of patients in intensive care unit is important. When meeting the patients’ needs, their individual characteristics should be taken into consideration.

Suggested Citation

  • Ilme Aro & Anna‐Maija Pietilä & Katri Vehviläinen‐Julkunen, 2012. "Needs of adult patients in intensive care units of Estonian hospitals: a questionnaire survey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(13-14), pages 1847-1858, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:13-14:p:1847-1858
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04092.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04092.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04092.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiwon Hong & Jiyeon Kang, 2020. "Development and Validation of a Patient Version of Person-Centered Critical Care Nursing Questionnaire: A Methodological Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    2. Helene Berntzen & Ida Torunn Bjørk & Ann‐Marie Storsveen & Hilde Wøien, 2020. "“Please mind the gap”: A secondary analysis of discomfort and comfort in intensive care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2441-2454, July.
    3. Annelies Wassenaar & Mark van den Boogaard & Truus van der Hooft & Peter Pickkers & Lisette Schoonhoven, 2015. "‘Providing good and comfortable care by building a bond of trust’: nurses views regarding their role in patients' perception of safety in the Intensive Care Unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(21-22), pages 3233-3244, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:13-14:p:1847-1858. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.