IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i11-12p1755-1762.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effects of perceived stress and ways of coping in a sample of Portuguese health workers

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos A Laranjeira

Abstract

Aim. The goal of this study is to clarify the association between perceived stress in work and the types of coping strategies used by Portuguese nurses. Background. The healthcare work environment as a source of overwork and stress has been implicated in today’s nursing shortage. Staff nurses play a pivotal role in creating work environments, but little is known about the nature of Portuguese nurses’ work. Design. A descriptive correlational design and a cross‐sectional approach were used for this study. Method. A total of 102 registered nurses, in three Portuguese hospitals, were selected. The Perceived Stress Scale and the Ways of Coping Questionnaire were used to measure job stress and coping strategies, respectively. Results. High levels of stress were reported by 52·2% of respondents. The results showed that the main stressful factors for nurses are patient death and dying (32·8%), followed by emergency situations (22·8%) and low supportive relationships (18·0%). The most frequently used coping strategy was self‐controlling, followed by planful problem‐solving and seeking social support. Pearson’s correlation tests indicated that the total score of the Perceived Stress Scale significantly negatively correlated with the subscales of the use of coping strategies of seeking social support, self‐controlling, planful problem‐solving, distancing and escape‐avoidance, indicating that those who were more distressed showed lower levels in mentioned coping subscales. Conclusion. Stress in nursing can be best reduced through the application of the control cycle approach and risk assessment/risk management techniques. Stress management of nurses may improve their productivity and quality of life. Relevance to clinical practice. A change in leadership styles from the managerial level and reallocation of personnel may help reduce job stress. It is important for clinical practitioners to understand theoretical research concerning human stress responses, appraisal and coping to apply knowledge in practice when dealing with a client who has experienced a crisis.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos A Laranjeira, 2012. "The effects of perceived stress and ways of coping in a sample of Portuguese health workers," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(11‐12), pages 1755-1762, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:11-12:p:1755-1762
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03948.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03948.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03948.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ji-Young Lim & Geun-Myun Kim & Eun-Joo Kim, 2022. "Factors Associated with Job Stress among Hospital Nurses: A Meta-Correlation Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Anliu Nie & Xiangfen Su & Shuzeng Zhang & Wenjie Guan & Jianfeng Li, 2020. "Psychological impact of COVID‐19 outbreak on frontline nurses: A cross‐sectional survey study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(21-22), pages 4217-4226, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:11-12:p:1755-1762. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.