IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i11-12p1716-1725.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovations and action research to develop research skills for nursing and midwifery practice: the Innovations in Nursing and Midwifery Practice Project study

Author

Listed:
  • Kenda Crozier
  • Jenny Moore
  • Katharine Kite

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To develop sustainable resources and activity in one hospital to encourage, support and build research activity and innovation among nurses and midwives. Background. Much resource is spent internationally to enable nurses and midwives to critique and quote research papers. The evidence suggests that little resource is focussed on enabling staff to conduct structured interventions that implement research as a service improvement activity, or enable nurses and midwives to undertake research in their clinical areas. Design. Two cycles of action research took place in the hospital led by a steering group of insiders and outsiders. Each cycle was evaluated through interviews with participants and analysis of steering group meeting records. Method. Action research methodology was used to develop partnership working between the hospital and university. A steering group of participants in the project led the development and made decisions based on findings from the evaluation stages of each cycle. Results. The data demonstrate that the process is one of the slow snowball effects that gathered momentum. Key skills such as leadership, resourcing and time management are required alongside research skills. Conclusions. Nursing research capacity can be developed in institutions where there are individuals with an enthusiasm to drive the agenda. Structures and processes need to be clear and transparent as well as supportive at the individual level. Change of this nature takes time and sustained effort. Relevance to clinical practice. This study demonstrates that a combination of strong leadership, partnership working and development of clear infrastructure enabled nurses and midwives who provide direct patient care to develop, implement and evaluate their own service improvement/research initiatives. Enabling nurses and midwives to use research methods in their practice increases the amount of nurse/midwife‐led evidence‐based innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenda Crozier & Jenny Moore & Katharine Kite, 2012. "Innovations and action research to develop research skills for nursing and midwifery practice: the Innovations in Nursing and Midwifery Practice Project study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(11‐12), pages 1716-1725, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:11-12:p:1716-1725
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03936.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03936.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03936.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anne Lunden & Marianne Teräs & Tarja Kvist & Arja Häggman‐Laitila, 2019. "Transformative agency and tensions in knowledge management—A qualitative interview study for nurse leaders," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5-6), pages 969-979, March.
    2. Albara Alomari & Suzanne Sheppard‐Law & Joanne Lewis & Val Wilson, 2020. "Effectiveness of Clinical Nurses’ interventions in reducing medication errors in a paediatric ward," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(17-18), pages 3403-3413, September.
    3. Albara Alomari & Val Wilson & Joanne Lewis, 2020. "Action research: A mechanism for active engagement of clinical nurses in a program of research," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 539-547, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:11-12:p:1716-1725. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.