IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i11-12p1697-1705.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenges and expectations of the Mental Capacity Act 2005: an interview‐based study of community‐based specialist nurses working in dementia care

Author

Listed:
  • Kritika Samsi
  • Jill Manthorpe
  • Tayvanie Nagendran
  • Hazel Heath

Abstract

Aims. This study aimed to explore experiences of specialist community nurses providing information about the Mental Capacity Act and supporting people with dementia and carers. Background. The role of specialist community nurses and case managers, such as Admiral Nurses, suggests that providing information about the recent Mental Capacity Act (2005) in England and Wales would be appreciated by people with dementia and carers and would assist in assessment and support. Design. In‐depth qualitative methodology was adopted to explore experiences and opinions of Admiral Nurses using the Mental Capacity Act. Method. A volunteer sample of 15 Admiral Nurses were interviewed in 2008 about their experiences of explaining the legal framework to carers and people with dementia and expectations of the Act. Thematic analysis identified textual consistencies in the interviews. Results. Most participants reported positively about the Mental Capacity Act and considered it beneficial when working with people with dementia and carers. Specific themes included knowledge acquisition and training, alongside limited confidence with implementation; practice experiences in the community and the empowering nature of the Mental Capacity Act; practice expectations and challenges with implementation. Conclusion. The Mental Capacity Act has potential for supporting the safeguarding and empowerment role of community nurses. However, not all participants felt confident using it and speculated this would improve with greater familiarity and use, which should be facilitated by refresher training and supervision. Relevance to clinical practice. The article concludes that nurses providing support to carers and of people with dementia may need greater familiarity about legal provisions. This may assist them in providing general information, making timely referrals to sources of specialist legal advice, and in using the Act to reduce anxiety, conflict and disputes.

Suggested Citation

  • Kritika Samsi & Jill Manthorpe & Tayvanie Nagendran & Hazel Heath, 2012. "Challenges and expectations of the Mental Capacity Act 2005: an interview‐based study of community‐based specialist nurses working in dementia care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(11‐12), pages 1697-1705, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:11-12:p:1697-1705
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03912.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03912.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03912.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Catharine Jenkins & Natalie Webster & Analisa Smythe & Fiona Cowdell, 2020. "What is the nature of Mental Capacity Act training and how do health and social care practitioners change their practice post‐training? A narrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2093-2106, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:11-12:p:1697-1705. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.