IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i11-12p1515-1523.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of respiration‐related quality of life of Chinese patients with silicosis and its influencing factors using the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)

Author

Listed:
  • Hongbo Liu
  • Bo Yan
  • Bing Han
  • Jinkai Sun
  • Yang Yang
  • Jie Chen

Abstract

Aims and objectives. The aims are to assess respiration‐related quality of life using the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire and determine its influencing factors among patients with silicosis in China. Background. The incidence of silicosis had an increasing trend in recent years in developing countries. Although the majority of patients with silicosis are in therapy routinely, the patients’ quality of life has been impaired because silicosis cannot be cured. The study on quality of life of patients with silicosis is few, and clinical physicians have difficulty in planning to promote quality of life of patients with silicosis according to the current health situation. Design. A cross‐sectional design was used for this study. Methods. A survey was performed on patients with silicosis by face‐to‐face interview in the Shenyang No. 9 Hospital in China. The St. George Respiratory Questionnaire was used to assess respiration‐related quality of life. Results. In all 208 enrolled patients with silicosis, symptoms, activity and impacts scores were 56·02, 56·46 and 52·33, respectively. Lower impacts scores were found comparing with symptoms and activity ones. Patient age was associated with an expected decrease in respiration‐related quality of life. Patients with longer duration of exposure had higher total scores of the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire, indicating worse quality of life. Patients with more co‐morbidities reported worse quality of life. Conclusion. Patients with silicosis were found relatively moderate respiration‐related quality of life. Shortening dust exposure, decreasing the number of co‐morbidity and controlling the occurrence of pulmonary tuberculosis could improve respiration‐related quality of life. Relevance to clinical practice. As indicated by the results of this study, the number of co‐morbidity negatively impact the quality of life of patients with silicosis. Clinical physicians and nurses should pay close attention to the co‐morbidity to promote quality of life of patients with silicosis according to the current health situation.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongbo Liu & Bo Yan & Bing Han & Jinkai Sun & Yang Yang & Jie Chen, 2012. "Assessment of respiration‐related quality of life of Chinese patients with silicosis and its influencing factors using the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(11‐12), pages 1515-1523, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:11-12:p:1515-1523
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03904.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03904.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03904.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:11-12:p:1515-1523. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.