IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i9-10p1339-1348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reclaiming time for nursing practice in nutritional care: outcomes of implementing Protected Mealtimes in a residential aged care setting

Author

Listed:
  • Sandra Ullrich
  • Helen McCutcheon
  • Barbara Parker

Abstract

Aims. To improve nutritional care and the mealtime experience of older people in a residential aged care setting by assisting nurses to create change to their practice and to the mealtime environment. Background. Despite being preventable and treatable, inadequate nutrition remains a problem for many older people in residential aged care and tertiary health care settings. Nevertheless, many organisations are uniquely positioned to implement solutions that will lead to better care. Design. The study used a qualitative, action research approach, grounded in the participatory worldview. Methods. The multimethod approach of data and between‐method triangulation were chosen to assist in understanding the multidimensional issues associated with resident mealtimes and the provision of nutritional care. The collection of non‐participant observations was informed by aspects of the Developmental Research Sequence. Action group meetings and non‐participant observations were qualitatively analysed using the Analytic Hierarchy. Results. Protected Mealtimes was tailored for the residential aged care unit. The most significant change involved the transformation of system processes by creating the space in nurses’ busy schedules and thus reclaiming time for nurses to reconnect with nutritional care. Fixed role boundaries were made flexible by assisting individuals to understand and extend their roles in nutritional care. Most importantly, sustainability of Protected Mealtimes was achieved and long‐term changes around nutritional care continued to be resident focused. Conclusions. This study demonstrates that lasting changes to nursing practice in nutritional care can be achieved by applying the principles of a participatory worldview and action research. Relevance to clinical practice. Change is challenging to achieve in complex health care organisations. This study bridges the gap between theory and practice and has shown that nurses can create change by employing a participatory worldview and action research as part of their toolkit for problem solving.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandra Ullrich & Helen McCutcheon & Barbara Parker, 2011. "Reclaiming time for nursing practice in nutritional care: outcomes of implementing Protected Mealtimes in a residential aged care setting," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(9‐10), pages 1339-1348, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:9-10:p:1339-1348
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03598.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03598.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03598.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christina Juthberg & Eva Ericson-Lidman, 2016. "Experiences of a PAR Intervention in Care for Older People," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 25(6), pages 646-664, December.
    2. Malene Beck & Bente Martinsen & Ingrid Poulsen & Regner Birkelund, 2016. "Mealtimes in a neurological ward: a phenomenological‐hermeneutic study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(11-12), pages 1614-1623, June.
    3. Dorthe Sørensen & Anna Rottensten Wieghorst & Johanne Andersen Elbek & Camilla Askov Mousing, 2020. "Mealtime challenges in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Who is responsible?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(23-24), pages 4583-4593, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:9-10:p:1339-1348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.