IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i7-8p1160-1167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Secondary prevention and learning needs post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): perspectives of both patients and nurses

Author

Listed:
  • Brid Kilonzo
  • Rhona O’Connell

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To evaluate the learning needs of patients post percutaneous coronary intervention from the perspective of both patients’ and cardiac nurses’. Background. Increasing numbers of patients with cardiovascular disease are managed using postpercutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. This paper presents findings of a study which explored the cardiac learning needs of these patients. Design. Descriptive survey from one cardiac unit where approximately 30 post percutaneous coronary intervention were performed per month. Methods. Self‐report data were provided by patients using an adaptation of the Nursing Information and Support scale for health‐related quality of life informational needs. This scale includes physical, psychosocial, emotional and disease‐specific dimensions. The questionnaire was also provided to cardiac nurses. Statistical tests applied were Spearman’s Correlation and the Mann–Whitney U test. Results. Patients (n = 33) and nurses (n = 13) completed the questionnaire. Disease‐specific items, physical action, psychosocial and emotional information were the categories that patients found most important. Cardiac nurses perceived physical action as least important and focused more on psychosocial and emotional issues. Individual items revealed the patients particularly valued their interaction with the nurses. Conclusions. Patients appear to be more concerned with their immediate state and disease rather than their psychosocial or emotional state. Mean rankings within scales demonstrate the value patients place on the nurse–patient relationship and the time needed for this. Relevance to clinical practice. Findings may be helpful to nurses who wish to addresses secondary prevention issues with patients’ post percutaneous coronary intervention who experience short hospital stays.

Suggested Citation

  • Brid Kilonzo & Rhona O’Connell, 2011. "Secondary prevention and learning needs post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): perspectives of both patients and nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(7‐8), pages 1160-1167, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:7-8:p:1160-1167
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03601.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03601.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03601.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rita Smith & Kate Frazer & Patricia Hall & Abbey Hyde & Laserina O'Connor, 2017. "‘Betwixt and between health and illness’ – women's narratives following acute coronary syndrome," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(21-22), pages 3457-3470, November.
    2. Shu Ding & Ying Deng & Sai Lu & Karen V Lamb & Ying Zhang & Ying Wu, 2017. "Knowledge and practice in cardiovascular disease prevention among hospital registered nurses: a cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(21-22), pages 3318-3327, November.
    3. Rita Smith & Kate Frazer & Abbey Hyde & Laserina O'Connor & Patricia Davidson, 2018. "“Heart disease never entered my head”: Women's understanding of coronary heart disease risk factors," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(21-22), pages 3953-3967, November.
    4. Outi Kähkönen & Päivi Kankkunen & Heikki Miettinen & Marja‐Leena Lamidi & Terhi Saaranen, 2017. "Perceived social support following percutaneous coronary intervention is a crucial factor in patients with coronary heart disease," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(9-10), pages 1264-1280, May.
    5. Sultan M Mosleh & Nidal F Eshah & Mona MA Almalik, 2017. "Perceived learning needs according to patients who have undergone major coronary interventions and their nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3-4), pages 418-426, February.
    6. Outi Kähkönen & Terhi Saaranen & Päivi Kankkunen & Marja‐Leena Lamidi & Helvi Kyngäs & Heikki Miettinen, 2018. "Predictors of adherence to treatment by patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 989-1003, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:7-8:p:1160-1167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.