IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i5-6p706-713.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The profile of absconding psychiatric inpatients in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Eimear Muir‐Cochrane
  • Krista Mosel
  • Adam Gerace
  • Adrian Esterman
  • Len Bowers

Abstract

Aims and objectives. The purpose of this study was to examine absconding behaviour (a patient leaving the hospital without permission) in acute and rehabilitation wards of one Australian psychiatric institution to describe the characteristics of the absconding patient and these events. Background. Absconding is a significant issue in psychiatric inpatient settings, with risks that include patient harm, aggression and violence. In spite of this, limited research has been conducted in Australia on patients who abscond while receiving psychiatric care. Design. The study was a retrospective descriptive analysis. Method. Absconding events from three acute and seven rehabilitation wards over a 12‐month period were studied. Results. The rate of absconding events by detained patients was 20·82%. Gender was not significantly associated with absconding, although 61·19% of those who absconded were men diagnosed with schizophrenic disorders. Over half of acute care patients who absconded left during their first 21‐day detention order. More than half of absconding events were by patients that absconded more than once. There was limited support for the efficacy of locking ward doors. Age and diagnosis emerged as particularly important factors to consider. Discussion. The study revealed that men are not more likely to abscond than women, that locking ward doors does not deter the determined absconders and that once a person has absconded, they are more likely to do so again. Younger patients and those with a schizophrenic disorder may be particularly likely to abscond. There also appears to be a link between continuing detention orders and an absconding event. Conclusions. Findings provide new data about the profile of absconding patients in Australia. Exploration of the reasons why patients abscond and why many do so repeatedly warrants further investigation. Relevance to clinical practice. Risk management approaches taking into account factors associated with absconding could be trialled to reduce the incidence of absconding in psychiatric inpatient settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Eimear Muir‐Cochrane & Krista Mosel & Adam Gerace & Adrian Esterman & Len Bowers, 2011. "The profile of absconding psychiatric inpatients in Australia," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(5‐6), pages 706-713, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:5-6:p:706-713
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03553.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03553.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03553.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lorna Ferguson, 2022. "Risk factors and missing persons: advancing an understanding of ‘risk’," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:5-6:p:706-713. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.