IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i3-4p464-478.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An integrative review of the literature on registered nurses’ medication competence

Author

Listed:
  • Virpi Sulosaari
  • Riitta Suhonen
  • Helena Leino‐Kilpi

Abstract

Aims and objectives. The aim of this integrative literature review was to describe registered nurses’ medication competence. The objectives of the literature review were to chart the need for future studies and use the results for instrument development. Background. Nurses play a vital role in different phases of a patient’s medication process and thus need adequate competence to fulfil their role. Research on nurses’ level of medication competence in different competency areas has been published. However, previous studies have lacked a comprehensive or integrated definition or description of medication competence in nursing. Design. Integrative literature review. Methods. The integrative literature review followed five stages: (1) problem identification, (2) literature search, (3) data evaluation, (4) data analysis and (5) presentation. Eligible articles were identified via systematic literature search of research and evidence‐based – databases. Twenty‐one studies met the selection criteria. Results. Eleven competency areas that constitute nurses’ medication competence were identified: (1) anatomy and physiology, (2) pharmacology, (3) communication, (4) interdisciplinary collaboration, (5) information seeking, (6) mathematical and medication calculation, (7) medication administration, (8) medication education, (9) assessment and evaluation, (10) documentation and (11) promoting medication safety as part of patient safety. The analysis revealed three major categories which integrate these competency areas: (1) decision making competence, (2) theoretical competence and (3) practical competence. Conclusions. Medication competence requires a solid knowledge base and the ability to apply that knowledge in real‐life situations during often complex and dynamic patient medication processes. Decision making competence was found to be an important and integral part of a nurses’ theoretical and practical competence. These main competence categories integrated all of the 11 competency areas identified in this review. Relevance to clinical practice. It is important to determine registered nurses’ medication competence in the context of developing nursing education and migration of the nursing workforce. This literature review contributes an integrated perspective on nurses’ medication competence and in doing so has clinical relevance for curriculum development and to future research in this area.

Suggested Citation

  • Virpi Sulosaari & Riitta Suhonen & Helena Leino‐Kilpi, 2011. "An integrative review of the literature on registered nurses’ medication competence," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(3‐4), pages 464-478, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:3-4:p:464-478
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03228.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03228.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03228.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emily Rohde & Elizabeth Domm, 2018. "Nurses’ clinical reasoning practices that support safe medication administration: An integrative review of the literature," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 402-411, February.
    2. Kari Toverud Jensen & Unni Knutstad & Tonks N. Fawcett, 2018. "The challenge of the biosciences in nurse education: A literature review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(9-10), pages 1793-1802, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:3-4:p:464-478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.