IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i13-14p1961-1970.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A qualitative review: the stigma of tuberculosis

Author

Listed:
  • Neti Juniarti
  • David Evans

Abstract

Background. Tuberculosis is a major health problem internationally and brings with it a range of physical, economic and social consequences. There is a stigma associated with having tuberculosis because the disease is commonly viewed as a ‘dirty disease’. This stigma can have a negative impact on an individual and may delay the person seeking treatment. Aims. The aim of this review was to explore the stigma and impact of having tuberculosis or having a family member with tuberculosis. Design. Literature review. Method. A comprehensive search of the electronic databases was undertaken. Inclusion criteria for the review were studies that investigated people with tuberculosis or their families, focused on the stigma or impact of tuberculosis and reported descriptions of the experience. Data were synthesised using a thematic analysis. Results. The literature search identified thirty studies. Three themes emerged from the synthesis: shame, isolation and fear. The shame related to tuberculosis being viewed as a bad disease, a dirty disease. Isolation involved both the withdrawal from social contact and the shunning of contact by other people. Fear was a consequence of the many difficulties that accompany tuberculosis. These factors operated at three levels, on the individual level, the family level and the societal level. Conclusion. The stigma that accompanies tuberculosis can have a negative impact on the individual and family and may result in their withdrawal from society because of shame and fear. The review highlights the need for education to provide practical strategies for individuals and families and to educate communities where tuberculosis is endemic. Relevance to clinical practice. The review highlights the widespread ignorance of tuberculosis and need for education of the individual, family and community. This education should provide practical strategies to help people cope with tuberculosis. It also suggests that ensuring confidentiality should be an important component of management strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Neti Juniarti & David Evans, 2011. "A qualitative review: the stigma of tuberculosis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(13‐14), pages 1961-1970, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:13-14:p:1961-1970
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03516.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03516.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03516.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cindra Paskaria & Deni Kurniadi Sunjaya & Ida Parwati & Muhammad Begawan Bestari, 2022. "Digital Health to Strengthen District-Based Public–Private Mix Tuberculosis Control in Purwakarta District, Indonesia: A Qualitative Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-11, September.
    2. Daniel G Datiko & Dereje Habte & Degu Jerene & Pedro Suarez, 2019. "Knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to TB among the general population of Ethiopia: Findings from a national cross-sectional survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, October.
    3. K. A. T. M. Ehsanul Huq & Michiko Moriyama & David Krause & Habiba Shirin & John Koku Awoonor-Willaims & Mahfuzur Rahman & Md Moshiur Rahman, 2022. "Perceptions, Attitudes, Experiences and Opinions of Tuberculosis Associated Stigma: A Qualitative Study of the Perspectives among the Bolgatanga Municipality People of Ghana," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-19, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:13-14:p:1961-1970. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.