IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i5-6p749-765.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A critical review of the evidence for nurses as information providers to cancer patients

Author

Listed:
  • Sotiria Koutsopoulou
  • Elizabeth DE Papathanassoglou
  • Maria C Katapodi
  • Elisabeth I Patiraki

Abstract

Aims. To review evidence on the role of oncology nurses in the provision of information to cancer patients and to delineate evidence‐based implications for clinical practice and research. Background. Provision of information is central for the empowerment of patients to participate in their care. There is not enough evidence regarding the nursing role in the information delivery process in cancer patients. Design. Descriptive literature review. Methods. From January 1990–2008, databases searched included Medline, CINAHL, PubMed, CancerLit and the Cochrane Library. Original research articles addressing the role of nurses in information delivery were included. We explored evidence on: (1) the effectiveness of nurses as information providers, (2) the way patients evaluate nurses’ input to information delivery, (3) the extent to which nurses contribute to information delivery to cancer patients and (4) the types of information provided by nurses. Results. The most important findings were: (1) nurses’ role as information providers for cancer patients is prominent, especially after the initiation of treatment, (2) specialist nurses are very effective in providing information, (3) no clear evidence exists on how nurses compare with other health‐care professionals as information providers and (4) some evidence exists that patients may prefer nurses as information providers at specific times in their treatment and especially in regards to symptom management. Conclusion. Well‐designed studies provide some evidence that nurses are effective as information providers to cancer patients. Specifically, oncology nurses are able to provide information of both high quality and of appropriate quantity and to assist individuals to interpret information provided by others. Relevance to clinical practice. Oncology nurses should be specifically educated and prepared to offer explicit, practical and timely information and they should be trained in interpersonal communication skills, which will increase their ability to comprehend patient information needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Sotiria Koutsopoulou & Elizabeth DE Papathanassoglou & Maria C Katapodi & Elisabeth I Patiraki, 2010. "A critical review of the evidence for nurses as information providers to cancer patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(5‐6), pages 749-765, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:5-6:p:749-765
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02954.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02954.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02954.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sirkka Lauri & Carita Sainio, 1998. "Developing the nursing care of breast cancer patients: an action research approach," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(5), pages 424-432, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Siv Tove Aunan & Gry Ciekals Wallgren & Britt Sætre Hansen, 2019. "Breast cancer survivors' experiences of dealing with information during and after adjuvant treatment: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(15-16), pages 3012-3020, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:5-6:p:749-765. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.