IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i3-4p422-431.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prospective study of postpartum depression in eastern Turkey prevalence, socio‐demographic and obstetric correlates, prenatal anxiety and early awareness

Author

Listed:
  • İsmet Kirpinar
  • Sebahat Gözüm
  • Türkan Pasinlioğlu

Abstract

Aims and objectives. The study was undertaken to provide an estimate of the prevalence of postpartum depression and its correlates. Further, we sought to evaluate the predictive power of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale when administered at postpartum week one for symptoms of depression at postpartum week six. Background. Postpartum depression is a major health issue for women worldwide with well‐documented negative health consequences for the mother and family. It is therefore important to evaluate prenatal detection of women at risk for developing postpartum depression. Design. A prospective study. Methods. The study involved 479 pregnant women in Erzurum, Turkey who were evaluated during the third trimester of pregnancy and at one and six weeks postpartum by community midwives. Questionnaires were used for data collection. Anxiety/social support scales were used for baseline evaluation, and the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale was administered at one and six weeks postpartum. Results. The prevalence of depressive symptoms according to the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale was 17·7% at first week and 14% at sixth week postpartum. The factors that were most predictive of postpartum depression were psychiatric history during pregnancy; prenatal anxiety; poor marital relationship in the first postpartum weeks; lack of health insurance and lack of contraceptive use. The correlation between symptoms of depression at one and six weeks in the postpartum period was significant. Conclusions. The prevalence of postpartum depression and its correlates were similar to the results of Western studies. Early identification of potential risk factors may aid in recognition of and treatment for postpartum depression. The Edinburgh scale is a simple yet useful tool to use during the early postpartum period for evaluation of depressive symptoms. Relevance to clinical practice. This study highlights the utility of screening for risk of postpartum depression during pregnancy and also during the early postpartum period.

Suggested Citation

  • İsmet Kirpinar & Sebahat Gözüm & Türkan Pasinlioğlu, 2010. "Prospective study of postpartum depression in eastern Turkey prevalence, socio‐demographic and obstetric correlates, prenatal anxiety and early awareness," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3‐4), pages 422-431, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:3-4:p:422-431
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03046.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03046.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03046.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tulay Sati Kirkan & Nazan Aydin & Esra Yazici & Puren Akcali Aslan & Hamit Acemoglu & Ali Gokhan Daloglu, 2015. "The depression in women in pregnancy and postpartum period: A follow-up study," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 61(4), pages 343-349, June.
    2. Nitikorn Phoosuwan & Mereerat Manwong & Leif Eriksson & Pranee C. Lundberg, 2020. "Perinatal depressive symptoms among Thai women: A hospital‐based longitudinal study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(2), pages 309-317, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:3-4:p:422-431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.