IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i23-24p3527-3534.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A survey of registered nurses’ perceptions of the code of professional conduct in Hong Kong

Author

Listed:
  • Janita P‐C Chau
  • Lai‐Wah Lam
  • May H‐L Lui
  • Wan‐Yim Ip
  • Wai‐Tong Chien
  • Iris F‐K Lee
  • David R Thompson

Abstract

Aim. To examine the perceptions of the code of professional conduct among practising registered nurses in Hong Kong. Background. A code of professional conduct is intended to guide nurses in their practice and to ensure congruence with nursing goals and objectives. Such a code for nurses in Hong Kong has been in effect for two decades but, to date, no study has examined the perceptions of it among practising nurses. Design. A survey of 320 practising registered nurses working in a hospital cluster in Hong Kong (mean postregistration experience = 11·8 years). Methods. A questionnaire developed to assess nurses’ perceptions of the Code of Professional Conduct devised by the Nursing Council of Hong Kong. Results. Providing safe and competent care, practising in accordance with the law and maintaining agreed standards were ranked in order as the three most important aspects. Safeguarding informed decision‐making for patients who were mentally incapacitated or unable to speak for themselves, participating in continuing nursing education and raising objections to practices that compromise safe and appropriate care were considered the most challenging aspects to achieve in professional nursing practice. Conclusions. To educate nurses to become more assertive in safeguarding patients’ rights and to encourage and support lifelong learning remains a major challenge in professional nursing practice. The profession and statutory bodies need to consider how best to enable practising nurses to address these issues. Relevance to clinical practice. Examining the perceptions of practising nurses about the professional code is necessary to ensure that the profession is prepared to meet the ever‐changing demands and expectations of the public whom it claims to serve.

Suggested Citation

  • Janita P‐C Chau & Lai‐Wah Lam & May H‐L Lui & Wan‐Yim Ip & Wai‐Tong Chien & Iris F‐K Lee & David R Thompson, 2010. "A survey of registered nurses’ perceptions of the code of professional conduct in Hong Kong," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(23‐24), pages 3527-3534, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:23-24:p:3527-3534
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03349.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03349.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03349.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:23-24:p:3527-3534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.