IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i19-20p2925-2932.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical care nurses’ experiences of follow‐up visits to an ICU

Author

Listed:
  • Åsa Engström
  • Siv Söderberg

Abstract

Aim. The aim of this study was to describe critical care nurses’ experiences of follow‐up visits for formerly critically ill people discharged from an intensive care unit and their close relatives. Background. The critical illness experience affects the ill person and their close relatives not only during the stay in an intensive care unit, but also for a long time afterwards. Follow‐up visits were introduced to offer people the opportunity to talk about their experiences. This activity has not been studied earlier from the perspective of critical care nurses. Design. The design of this study was qualitative. Method. Eight critical care nurses narrated their experiences of follow‐up visits by formerly critically ill people and their close relatives to an intensive care unit. Data were collected during 2007–2008. Qualitative thematic content analysis was applied to the interview texts. Results. The findings show that to feel they were doing a good job it was vital for the critical care nurses to be well prepared for the follow‐up visits. It was difficult, in a positive way, to recognise formerly critically ill people when they returned looking healthy. The critical care nurses were disappointed that their former patients remembered so few real events. The follow‐up visits gave the critical care nurses a new picture of how the critically illness experience influenced the former patient’s everyday life during and after their stay in the intensive care unit and how it affected the lives of their close relatives. Conclusions. Through sharing the experiences of formerly critically ill peoples’ and their close relatives’ critical care nurses receive valuable feedback about their work. Relevance to clinical practice. Receiving feedback about one’s work from follow‐up visits gives critical care nurses the possibility for to evaluate given care. Follow‐up visits to intensive care units can provide them with valuable knowledge that might lead to improved nursing care.

Suggested Citation

  • Åsa Engström & Siv Söderberg, 2010. "Critical care nurses’ experiences of follow‐up visits to an ICU," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(19‐20), pages 2925-2932, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:19-20:p:2925-2932
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03162.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03162.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03162.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lene Lehmkuhl & Ingrid Egerod & Dorthe Overgaard & Morten H. Bestle & Janet F. Jensen, 2020. "Stimulated by insight: Exploration of critical care nurses' experience of research participation in a recovery programme for intensive care survivors," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(7-8), pages 1312-1322, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:19-20:p:2925-2932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.