IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i17-18p2394-2405.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A literature review of the potential of telephone follow‐up in colorectal cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Martina Cusack
  • Claire Taylor

Abstract

Aims. The aim of this review is to examine the potential of telephone follow‐up for patients with colorectal cancer. Background. More people are surviving cancer and entering into follow‐up care. It is recognised that improvements in cancer follow‐up care are needed in the UK. Telephone use has proved a very successful medium for conducting health care in other specialties and may offer an acceptable alternative to face‐to‐face follow‐up appointments. Nurse specialists could assume responsibility for patients’ follow‐up by offering telephone consultations. Design. A literature review was conducted via a systematic electronic and hand search of relevant literature. Method. Thematic content analysis was used to achieve the objectives of the review. Results. The findings demonstrate that telephone follow‐up conducted by an experienced nurse specialist is cost‐effective and accepted by the majority of patients. Aspects of care such as symptom management and reassurance are possible over the phone. Conclusion. Telephone follow‐up meets patients’ satisfaction, support and information needs and has potential to deliver high standards of aftercare when conducted by a nurse specialist. It is at least equivalent to traditional follow‐up in meeting the needs of patients with cancer. Because of the disparity of the studies examined, further research in the area of nurse‐led telephone follow‐up vs. nurse‐led traditional follow‐up would be constructive in the development of this new initiative. Relevance to clinical practice. Nurses are now increasingly involved in patient follow‐up care and telephone dialogue after hospital discharge. However, the ideal structure, method and timing of telephone follow‐up as well as the skills required to carry out such care over the phone are often not considered and have not been articulated. The option of telephone follow‐up could, for some patients, dramatically improve their care experience.

Suggested Citation

  • Martina Cusack & Claire Taylor, 2010. "A literature review of the potential of telephone follow‐up in colorectal cancer," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(17‐18), pages 2394-2405, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:17-18:p:2394-2405
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03253.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03253.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03253.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ann‐Caroline Johansson & Eva Brink & Christina Cliffordson & Malin Axelsson, 2018. "The function of fatigue and illness perceptions as mediators between self‐efficacy and health‐related quality of life during the first year after surgery in persons treated for colorectal cancer," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1537-1548, April.
    2. Cindy E. Woods & Rikki Jones & Eilish O’Shea & Elizabeth Grist & John Wiggers & Kim Usher, 2019. "Nurse‐led postdischarge telephone follow‐up calls: A mixed study systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(19-20), pages 3386-3399, October.
    3. Semra Atasayar & Sevil Guler Demir, 2019. "Determination of the Problems Experienced by Patients Post-Thyroidectomy," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 28(5), pages 615-635, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:17-18:p:2394-2405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.